PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

A phase 2 study of darolutamide plus leuprolide acetate in hormone therapy–naïve recurrent and/or metastatic androgen receptor (AR)–positive salivary gland cancer (ETCTN 10553).

View Full Paper
AHAlan L. HoVKVarinder KaurSPShetal Patel

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of darolutamide combined with leuprolide acetate in patients with AR-positive salivary gland cancer.
  • Phase II trial with 20 patients enrolled, locally advanced/unresectable or recurrent/metastatic AR+ SGCs.
  • Patients received darolutamide 600 mg orally twice daily and leuprolide acetate injections over 28-day cycles.
  • Primary endpoint was best overall response rate within one year according to RECIST v1.1.
  • Among 20 patients, 8 (40%) achieved partial responses, 10 (50%) had stable disease, and 1 (5%) showed progression with ongoing treatment.
  • Results indicated 6 patients (30%) left the trial due to disease progression; 13 (65%) remained on treatment.
  • The findings support AR as a therapeutic target in a specific subset of salivary gland cancers.

Abstract

6012 Background: A subset of salivary gland cancers (SGCs) express the androgen receptor (AR). A prior AR+ SGC trial with the anti-androgen enzalutamide alone failed to meet its primary endpoint. This is a multicenter, phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the anti-androgen darolutamide (Bayer) in combination with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT; leuprolide acetate) in hormone-therapy naïve patients with AR+ SGCs. Methods: Patients with locally advanced/unresectable or recurrent/metastatic AR+ SGCs were enrolled. AR status was determined locally by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Prior AR-targeted therapy was not allowed, unless administered in the neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant setting >6 months before disease recurrence. Darolutamide 600 mg orally twice daily was given with leuprolide acetate intramuscular injections (1 cycle= 28 days). The primary endpoint was best overall response (BOR) rate according to RECIST v1.1 within 1 year of initiating treatment. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Exploratory endpoints were evaluating biomarkers in serially obtained research biopsies and exploring efficacy among patients who had not received prior systemic therapy. A two-stage minimax design was used to detect a 50% BOR rate (vs. 25%) (alpha = 9%; beta = 83%). ≥3 responses in the first 9 patients would trigger accrual to 20; ≥8 responses would be considered promising. Results: Study accrual of 20 patients (pts) with AR+ SGCs was completed on 10/30/25. 15 males, 5 females with a median age of 70.5 years were enrolled. Among the 9 pts in the first stage, 6 confirmed partial responses (PRs) were observed, allowing for full study accrual. With a data cutoff of 1/21/26, the best RECIST v1.1 responses among 20 pts were 8 (40% 19.1% 63.9%) PRs (7 confirmed, 1 unconfirmed with pt still on treatment), 10 (50% 27.2%, 72.8%) stable disease (SD), 1 (5% 1%, 24.9%) progression of disease; 1 pt on treatment has not had radiographic assessments yet. 6 (30% 11.9%, 54.3%) pts came off trial for disease progression, 1 (5% 1%, 24.9%) withdrew consent after 6 cycles, and 13 (65%, 40.8%, 84.6%) remain on treatment. Among 5 female pts, best responses were 1 (5% 1%, 24.9%) PR, 3 (15% 3.2%, 37.9%) SD, 1 (5% 1%, 24.9%) PD. With additional follow-up, PFS, OS, and biomarker data (AR IHC %, HER2 status) will be presented. Conclusions: In this molecularly selected cohort of patients with SGC, darolutamide plus ADT possesses significant clinical activity, validating AR as a relevant therapeutic target in a subset of SGCs. Analysis of serial research biopsies will be performed to identify biomarker and/or drug combination strategies to enhance the efficacy of AR-targeting. Clinical trial information: NCT05669664 .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ho et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192e68fab5b468c441768bhttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.6012
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper