When a fuel briquette is pressed using solar electricity in summer and burned for heating in winter, the briquette functions as a seasonal energy store—without batteries, self-discharge, or capital investment in storage infrastructure. This paper quantifies such “indirect energy storage” at an operating briquette production facility in Sumy, Ukraine, using 2024 operational data from a 34 kW hybrid solar power plant integrated into the production process without battery storage under continental climate conditions (50°55′ N) and full-scale military conflict. The objective was to determine the contribution of the solar power plant (SPP) to energy supply, analyse the structure of electricity consumption, and quantify the mechanism of indirect accumulation of renewable energy through transformation into solid biofuels. The study tested two hypotheses: (H1) that integration of a solar power plant into industrial daytime operation (6:00–22:00) achieves a self-consumption rate close to 100%, displacing grid electricity without curtailment or storage losses; and (H2) that the solar fraction embedded in produced briquettes constitutes a quantifiable mechanism of indirect seasonal energy storage despite a temporal mismatch between solar peaks (summer) and product demand (winter). Methods included statistical analysis of monthly and intraday operational data; Pearson correlation analysis between solar generation and production cycles; energy audit of production processes; decomposition of specific consumption into pressing and packaging components; and a simple economic assessment (NPV, IRR, LCOE, payback) with sensitivity analysis. Annual production reached 1222.975 t of briquettes. Total specific electricity consumption (including two short packaging campaigns in June and July only) was 141.3 ± 12.6 kWh/t (CV = 8.9%). After deducting 4962 kWh of dedicated packaging electricity (2.9% of annual consumption), the specific consumption for briquette pressing alone was 136.7 ± 5.0 kWh/t (CV = 3.7%)—within the European benchmark range of 80–150 kWh/t for wood densification, with tight monthly variation indicating a stable, well-tuned pressing operation throughout the year. The SPP supplied 18.3% of total annual electricity, peaking at 33.06% in May and averaging 29.95% from March to August. Intraday analysis of 530 five-minute intervals confirmed a 100% self-consumption rate across all seasons (H1 supported). A total of 223.4 t of briquettes containing accumulated solar energy were produced during the spring–summer period. A weak negative correlation (r = −0.28) between monthly SPP generation and briquette production was observed but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.385); this descriptive—rather than causal—relationship is consistent with the expected temporal shift between summer surpluses and winter demand, and is itself a signature of indirect rather than direct energy coupling (H2 supported in a descriptive sense). The compound efficiency along the solar-to-stored-fuel chain was estimated at approximately 68%, providing a quantitative indicator for the indirect-storage concept. Economic analysis yielded a simple payback period of about 3 years, NPV (20 yr, 12%) ≈ 1.15 million UAH, IRR ≈ 33%, and LCOE ≈ 3.28 UAH/kWh—61% below the prevailing industrial tariff of 8.45 UAH/kWh—with sensitivity analysis showing positive NPV across ±20% variation in electricity price and ±15% in CAPEX. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first empirical quantification of biomass-solar integration as a seasonal energy buffer operating without battery storage. The solar energy accumulated in briquettes is sufficient to heat 56–74 households for a full winter season. Regional scaling of the present configuration—under explicit assumptions of comparable facility sizes and operating regimes—could in principle provide fuel for 15,000–20,000 households (8–12% of regional heating needs during energy crises). These findings are directly relevant to post-conflict energy recovery and to regions where attacks on energy infrastructure have left solid biofuels as the primary available heating source.
Nekrasov et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: