PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 24, 2007The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal272 citationsOpen Access

Procalcitonin and C-Reactive Protein as Diagnostic Markers of Severe Bacterial Infections in Febrile Infants and Children in the Emergency Department

View Full Paper
BABarbara AndreolaSBSilvia BressanSCSilvia Callegaro

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP), compared with that of total white-blood cell count (WBC) and absolute neutrophil count (ANC), in predicting severe bacterial infections (SBIs) in febrile children admitted to Emergency Department. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in 408 children aged 7-days to 36-months, admitted with fever without source, at a tertiary care Pediatric Emergency Department. PCT, CRP, WBC, and ANC were determined upon admission and compared. Specificity, sensitivity, multilevel likelihood ratios, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and multivariate stepwise logistic regression were carried out. RESULTS: SBI was diagnosed in 94 children (23.1%). PCT, CRP, WBC, and ANC were significantly higher in this group than in non-SBI patients. The area under the ROC (AUC) obtained was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78-0.86) for PCT, 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81-0.88) for CRP (P = 0.358), 0.71 (95% CI: 0.66-0.75) for WBC, and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.70-0.78) for ANC. Only PCT (OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.11-1.57; P < 0.001) and CRP (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.03; P < 0.001) were retained as significant predictors of SBI in a multiple regression model. For infants with fever <8 hours (n = 45), AUC for PCT and CRP were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.80-0.98) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.60-0.87), respectively (P = 0.056). CONCLUSION: Both PCT and CRP are valuable markers in predicting SBI in children with fever without source and they perform better than WBC and ANC. PCT appears more accurate at the beginning of infections, but overall CRP may be the most convenient marker for its better sensitivity and feasibility.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Andreola et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a194348f3c200df10581e97https://doi.org/10.1097/inf.0b013e31806215e3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Fever in the new millennium: a review of recent studies of markers of serious bacterial infection in febrile children2005 · 86 citations
  2. 2Utility of the Serum C-reactive Protein for Detection of Occult Bacterial Infection in Children2002 · 102 citations
  3. 3Function of C-reactive protein2000 · 811 citations
  4. 4Failure of Infant Observation Scales in Detecting Serious Illness in Febrile, 4-to 8-Week-Old Infants1990 · 187 citations
  5. 5Advances in statistical methodology for the evaluation of diagnostic and laboratory tests1994 · 220 citations