PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 30, 2026Journal of Economic Studies0 citations

Retraction notice: Breaking glass ceilings or boardroom gridlock? Gender, independence and the new rules of MENA banking resilience

View Full Paper

Key Points

  • The notice addresses the retraction of an article discussing gender issues and banking resilience in MENA due to inaccuracies.
  • Identification of fundamentally incorrect and hallucinated references in the article.
  • Author cooperation during the investigation into the inaccuracies.
  • Noncompliance with credibility and accountability standards set by the journal.
  • The article's findings cannot be relied upon due to identified inaccuracies.
  • The author agrees with the retraction, attributing errors to a technical problem.
  • The journal issues an apology to readers for the inaccuracies.

Abstract

The publisher of Journal of Economic Studies wishes to retract the article Dorsaf B (2025), “Breaking glass ceilings or boardroom gridlock? Gender, independence and the new rules of MENA banking resilience”. Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-06-2025-0440. It has come to our attention that the following papers referenced throughout the text are fundamentally incorrect, hallucinated, or do not exist.The following references have also been identified as anomalous and inappropriate; the author was unable to provide sufficient justification for their presence in the article:The author cooperated with the investigation but failed to sufficiently address the identified concerns. As a result, the findings of the article cannot be relied upon. The Journal of Economic Studies author guidelines make it clear that authors must be accountable for the accuracy of their work. The decision to retract has been informed by COPE's guidelines on retractions and Emerald's publishing ethics. The author would like to note that they agree with the retraction and wishes to emphasize that these errors are the result of a technical problem. The publisher of the journal sincerely apologizes to the readers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

A 2026 study studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a7ecb0307b78509431629https://doi.org/10.1108/jes-05-2026-0496
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper