Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 30, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology

Comparative effectiveness of pembrolizumab and nivolumab as first-line treatment for advanced/unresectable or metastatic melanoma: A propensity-score adjusted analysis from a US national health system.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JNJosiah NietoGSGarth StrohbehnDGDaniel A. Goldstein

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Randomized trial compared safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus nivolumab in advanced melanoma, suggesting interchangeability.

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of pembrolizumab and nivolumab as treatments for advanced melanoma.
  • Data from the Veterans Affairs health system for pembrolizumab and nivolumab from 2015 to 2025 were analyzed.
  • Patients with BRAF mutations or those treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab were excluded.
  • Cox models and Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for outcome analysis.
  • Median time-to-next treatment was 14.6 months for pembrolizumab and 13.2 months for nivolumab (aHR 0.93, 95% CI 0.78, 1.11; p=0.43).
  • Median overall survival was 27.9 months for pembrolizumab and 25.3 months for nivolumab (aHR 0.97, 95% CI 0.80, 1.17; p=0.73).
  • Two-year cumulative event rates of prolonged corticosteroid use were 22.1% for pembrolizumab and 23.5% for nivolumab (aHR 1.02, 95% CI 0.71, 1.47; p=0.93).

Cite This Study

Nieto et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a7fce0307b78509431fc6https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e21513
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share