PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 30, 2022Frontiers in Pharmacology7 citationsOpen Access

Comparative efficacy and safety of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy in patients with chronic coronary syndromes after percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

YLYaowang LinZCZhigang CaiSDShaohong Dong

Key Result

In patients with chronic coronary syndromes after percutaneous coronary intervention, adding prasugrel to aspirin reduced the risk of MACE (OR 0.72) and myocardial infarction compared to aspirin alone, but increased the risk of major bleeding.

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=91,115)

Structured PICO

Do different antiplatelet or anticoagulant strategies improve ischemic and bleeding outcomes in patients with chronic coronary syndromes after percutaneous coronary intervention compared to aspirin alone?

P
Population
Patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
I
Intervention
Different antiplatelet or anticoagulant strategies (including addition of prasugrel, ticagrelor, or rivaroxaban 2.5 mg to aspirin, or clopidogrel monotherapy)
C
Comparator
Aspirin alone
O
Outcome
Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), mortality, ischemic and bleeding eventscomposite

In patients with chronic coronary syndromes after PCI, adding prasugrel or ticagrelor to aspirin reduces ischemic events at the cost of increased bleeding, while clopidogrel monotherapy appears to reduce MACE, stroke, and major bleeding compared to aspirin alone.

Main Result

Effect estimate: OR 0.72 (95% CI 0.60-0.86)

p-value: p=0.035

Limitations

  • The definition of MACE and major bleeding varied among the included studies.
  • None of the included studies had independently compared prasugrel with aspirin in CCS patients.
  • The time of follow-up was different between studies.
  • No large RCTs comparing ticagrelor (90 mg or 60 mg b.i.d) or prasugrel monotherapy with aspirin have been conducted in CCS patients after PCI.

Abstract

Aimed to evaluate and compare the interactive effects of different antiplatelet or anticoagulation strategies in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Randomized controlled trials comparing different antiplatelet or anticoagulant strategies in patients with CCS after PCI were included. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), mortality, ischemic and bleeding events. Compared to aspirin alone, addition of prasugrel or ticagrelor to aspirin resulted in lower risk of myocardial infarction (MI) odds ratio (OR): 0.38 (95% confidence interval 0.38–0.62); 0.810–0.84 (0.69–0.98) and any stroke 0.56 (0.42–0.75) at the expense of increased risk of major bleeding 1.79 (1.34–2.39); 2.08–2.38 (1.56–3.28), whereas, clopidogrel monotherapy reduced the risk of any stroke, major bleeding, and intracranial bleeding. On subgroup analysis, compared with aspirin alone, addition of prasugrel resulted in lower MACE 0.72 (0.60–0.86), MI 0.48 (0.38–0.62), and stent thrombosis 0.29 (0.09–0.91), whereas, addition of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg resulted in lower risk of MACE 0.72 (0.60–0.87), cardiac death 0.71 (0.52–0.98) and any stroke 0.65 (0.45–0.95), but not reduced MI. Both prasugrel and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg increased major bleeding 1.79 (1.34–2.39); 1.72 (1.33–2.22). Clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with lower MACE 0.72 (0.58–0.90), any stroke 0.42 (0.24–0.73), and major bleeding 0.62 (0.40–0.96). Adding prasugrel or ticagrelor led to a reduced incidence of MI and prasugrel was also found to reduce the risk of MACE and stent thrombosis in CCS patients with low risk of bleeding after PCI. Clopidogrel monotherapy has advantage in reducing MACE, stroke, and major bleeding events in CCS patients at high risk of bleeding after PCI. Systematic Review Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ , PROSPERO Identifier: CRD 42021291050.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lin et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=91,115). Antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy (prasugrel, ticagrelor, rivaroxaban, or clopidogrel) vs. Aspirin alone or aspirin plus placebo was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) (prasugrel vs aspirin subgroup) (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.86, p=0.035). In patients with chronic coronary syndromes after percutaneous coronary intervention, adding prasugrel to aspirin reduced the risk of MACE (OR 0.72) and myocardial infarction compared to aspirin alone, but increased the risk of major bleeding.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ab0b98198c9a8aa45ff2ahttps://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.992376
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper