PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1992European Heart Journal18 citations

Automated versus observer blood pressure as determinants of left ventricular structure

View Full Paper
RFR. FagardEBE BieleńAAAfshin Ameri

Structured PICO

Does automated or 24h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring better predict left ventricular structural changes compared to observer measurement in hypertensive patients?

P
Population
38 patients referred for hypertension
I
Intervention
Automated blood pressure measurement (Dinamap 845 device) and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
C
Comparator
Observer blood pressure measurement
O
Outcome
Left ventricular mass and mean wall thickness measured by echocardiographysurrogate

Abstract

We studied the contribution of automated blood pressure measurements to the variation in left ventricular structural characteristics, independent of pressure measured by an observer. Thirty eight patients referred for hypertension underwent 24 h blood pressure monitoring. Echocardiography and repeated blood pressure measurements were taken on 2 different days by an observer and by the use of the Dinamap 845 device. Blood pressure by the observer averaged 157/101 mmHg, Dinamap pressure 152/94 mmHg, 24 h pressure 137/92 mmHg, left ventricular mass 218 g and mean wall thickness 12.7 mm. Left ventricular mass and wall thickness were related (P 0.25). In conclusion, observer, Dinamap and ambulatory pressures are significantly related to cardiac structural variables. Ambulatory pressure, but not Dinamap pressure, explains a small part of wall thickness variance in addition to well-standardized pressure measured by an observer.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fagard et al. (1992) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ae350739ab56a908617eahttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060069
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper