PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 2001Critical Care Medicine58 citations

Radiologic determination of intravascular volume status using portable, digital chest radiography: A prospective investigation in 100 patients

View Full Paper
EEE. Wesley ElyASAllen C. SmithCCCaroline Chiles

Structured PICO

Does portable digital chest radiography accurately determine intravascular volume status in adult ICU patients?

P
Population
100 adult intensive care unit patients with pulmonary artery catheters (after excluding 35 for unacceptable PAOP tracings)
I
Intervention
Portable, anteroposterior, supine digital chest roentgenogram (CXR) interpreted with clinical data or using objective cutoffs (vascular pedicle width >70 mm and cardiothoracic ratio >0.55)
C
Comparator
Hemodynamic data (pulmonary artery occlusion pressure [PAOP] >18 mm Hg vs <18 mm Hg) measured within 1 hr of CXR
O
Outcome
Accuracy in differentiating volume status (PAOP >18 mm Hg vs <18 mm Hg)surrogate

Portable digital chest radiography can help differentiate intravascular volume status in ICU patients, with accuracy improved by using objective measurements like vascular pedicle width and cardiothoracic ratio.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To answer the following questions: Can the digital chest roentgenogram (CXR) be used to differentiate patients' volume status? Do clinical data alter radiologists' accuracy in interpreting the digital CXR? DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Nine adult intensive care units of a tertiary care medical center. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-five consecutive patients with pulmonary artery catheters, of whom 35 were excluded because of unacceptable pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) tracings. METHODS: Each patient had a portable, anteroposterior, supine digital CXR. Clinicians evaluated volume status and then measured hemodynamic data within 1 hr of the CXR. Digital CXRs were independently interpreted on two separate occasions (with and without clinical information) by three experienced chest radiologists, and these interpretations were compared with hemodynamic data. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients, 39 had PAOP >18 mm Hg, whereas 61 had PAOP 18 mm Hg from PAOP 70 mm and cardiothoracic ratio >0.55 or by incorporating clinical data.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ely et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bcea327b545b111a90c37https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200108000-00002
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Effectiveness of Right Heart Catheterization in the Initial Care of Critically Ill Patients1997 · 215 citations
  2. 2Clinical Assessment of Hemodynamic Values in Two Surgical Intensive Care Units1990 · 34 citations
  3. 3Logistic Regression Diagnostics1981 · 1,307 citations
  4. 4The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators1996 · 1,412 citations
  5. 5Detection of Left Ventricular Failure in Patients with Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome1975 · 70 citations