Elevated extracellular magnesium improves myocardial cytosolic free energy by reducing metabolic rate and calcium entry, providing superior protection during ischemia-reperfusion compared to calcium channel blockade in a rat heart model.
Metabolic and functional responses to extracellular Mg 2+ concentration (Mg 2+ o ) were studied in perfused rat heart. Elevations of Mg 2+ o from 1.2 to 2.4, 5.0, and 8.0 mM dose dependently reduced contractile function and myocardial oxygen consumption (MV˙o 2 ) up to 80%. Intracellular Mg 2+ concentration (Mg 2+ i ) remained stable (0.45–0.50 mM) during perfusion with 1.2–5.0 mM Mg 2+ o but increased to 0.81 ± 0.14 mM with 8.0 mM Mg 2+ o . Myocardial ATP was unaffected by Mg 2+ o, phosphocreatine (PCr) increased up to 25%, and P i declined by up to 50%. Free energy of ATP hydrolysis (Δ G ATP ) increased from −60 to −64 kJ/mol. Adenosine efflux declined in parallel with changes in MV˙o 2 and AMP. At comparable workload and MV˙o 2 , the effects of Mg 2+ o on cytosolic free energy were mimicked by reduced extracellular Ca 2+ concentration (Ca 2+ o ) or Ca 2+ antagonism with verapamil. Moreover, functional and energetic effects of Mg 2+ o were reversed by elevated Ca 2+ o . Despite similar reductions in preischemic function and MV˙o 2 , metabolic and functional recovery from 30 min of global ischemia was enhanced in hearts treated with 8.0 mM Mg 2+ o vs. 2.0 μM verapamil. It is concluded that 1) 1.2–8.0 mM Mg 2+ o improves myocardial cytosolic free energy indirectly by reducing metabolic rate and Ca 2+ entry; 2) Mg 2+ i does not respond rapidly to elevations in Mg 2+ o from 1.2 to 5.0 mM and is uninvolved in acute functional and metabolic responses to Mg 2+ o ; 3) adenosine formation in rat heart is indirectly reduced during elevated Mg 2+ o ; and 4) 8.0 mM Mg 2+ o provides superior protection during ischemia-reperfusion compared with functionally equipotent Ca 2+ channel blockade.
Headrick et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: