PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2005Radiographics371 citations

MR Imaging of Cardiac Tumors

View Full Paper
PSPatrick SparrowJKJohn B KurianTJTim R. Jones

Key Result

Magnetic resonance imaging provides superior resolution and soft-tissue contrast compared to echocardiography for evaluating cardiac tumors, identifying malignancy indicators like diameter >5 cm.

Structured PICO

Does MR imaging improve the evaluation and differentiation of cardiac tumors compared to echocardiography?

P
Population
Patients with cardiac neoplasms/tumors
I
Intervention
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (including T1-weighted, T2-weighted, gadolinium-enhanced, and cine gradient-echo sequences)
C
Comparator
Echocardiography
O
Outcome
Evaluation and differentiation of benign and malignant cardiac tumorssurrogate

MR imaging is a crucial tool for the accurate diagnosis and management of cardiac tumors, offering superior tissue characterization and anatomic definition compared to echocardiography.

Limitations

  • Overlap in the MR imaging appearances of cardiac tumors, particularly of primary malignancies

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is an important tool in the evaluation of cardiac neoplasms. T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and gadolinium-enhanced sequences are used for anatomic definition and tissue characterization, whereas cine gradient-echo imaging is used to assess functional effects. Recent improvements in pulse sequences for cardiac MR imaging have led to superior image quality, with reduced motion artifact and improved signal-to-noise ratio and tissue contrast. Although there is some overlap in the MR imaging appearances of cardiac tumors, particularly of primary malignancies, differences in characteristic locations and features should allow confident differentiation between benign and malignant tumors. Indicators of malignancy at MR imaging are invasive behavior, involvement of the right side of the heart or the pericardium, tissue inhomogeneity, diameter greater than 5 cm, and enhancement after administration of gadolinium contrast material (as a result of higher tissue vascularity). Concomitant pericardial or pleural effusions are rare in benign processes but occur in about 50% of cases of malignant tumors. MR imaging offers improved resolution, a larger field of view, and superior soft-tissue contrast compared with those of echocardiography, suggesting that knowledge of the MR imaging features of cardiac neoplasms is important for accurate diagnosis and management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sparrow et al. (2005) conducted a review in Cardiac tumors. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging vs. Echocardiography was evaluated. Magnetic resonance imaging provides superior resolution and soft-tissue contrast compared to echocardiography for evaluating cardiac tumors, identifying malignancy indicators like diameter >5 cm.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1c157267ec8852715ee640https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.255045721
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper