PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2002American Journal of Roentgenology189 citations

Detection and Characterization of Intracardiac Thrombi on MR Imaging

View Full Paper
JBJörg BarkhausenPHPeter HunoldHEHolger Eggebrecht

Key Result

Contrast-enhanced inversion recovery turbo FLASH MR imaging detected all 15 intracardiac thrombi, proving superior to HASTE (7), trueFISP (10), and echocardiography (12).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=24)

Structured PICO

Does MR imaging improve the diagnostic accuracy of detecting intracardiac thrombi compared to echocardiography in patients with known or suspected intracardiac thrombi?

P
Population
24 patients with known or suspected intracardiac thrombi
I
Intervention
MR imaging on a 1.5-T scanner using dark-blood-prepared HASTE, trueFISP cine, and inversion recovery turbo FLASH sequences after injection of 0.2 mmol/kg of gadolinium DTPA
C
Comparator
Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography
O
Outcome
Diagnostic accuracy to detect intracardiac thrombisurrogate

Contrast-enhanced inversion recovery turbo FLASH MR imaging is superior to echocardiography and other MR sequences for detecting intracardiac thrombi, particularly in the left ventricle.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy achieved using different MR techniques with the diagnostic accuracy achieved using transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography to detect intracardiac thrombi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with known or suspected intracardiac thrombi were examined using MR imaging and echocardiography. All MR examinations were performed on a 1.5-T MR scanner using dark-blood-prepared half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) sequences, fast imaging steady-state free precession (trueFISP) cine sequences, and inversion recovery gradient-echo fast low-angle-shot (inversion recovery turbo FLASH) sequences after injection of 0.2 mmol/kg of gadolinium diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid. RESULTS: MR imaging and echocardiography revealed 12 thrombi-two in the right atrium, one in the right ventricle, three in the left atrium, and six in the left ventricle. Compared with echocardiography, MR imaging revealed three additional thrombi in the left ventricle; these thrombi were confirmed at surgery. All 15 thrombi appeared as filling defects on early contrast-enhanced inversion recovery turbo FLASH MR images. Only seven thrombi were detected on HASTE images, and 10 thrombi were seen on trueFISP images. Four thrombi showed enhancement 10-20 min after contrast material injection and were characterized as organized clots. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced inversion recovery turbo FLASH sequences were superior to dark-blood-prepared HASTE and trueFISP cine MR images in revealing intracardiac thrombi. Compared with transthoracic echocardiography, MR imaging was more sensitive for the detection of left ventricular thrombi. The characterization of thrombi may be used to predict the risk of embolism, which is higher for subacute clots than for organized thrombi.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Barkhausen et al. (2002) conducted an observational in Known or suspected intracardiac thrombi (n=24). MR imaging (HASTE, trueFISP, and contrast-enhanced inversion recovery turbo FLASH) vs. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography was evaluated on Detection of intracardiac thrombi. Contrast-enhanced inversion recovery turbo FLASH MR imaging detected all 15 intracardiac thrombi, proving superior to HASTE (7), trueFISP (10), and echocardiography (12).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1c5fbe69a4af5b15a99c48https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.179.6.1791539
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper