PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 28, 2002Archives of Internal Medicine282 citations

Evaluation of the Benefits and Risks of Low-Dose Aspirin in the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events

View Full Paper
SWSteven M. WeismanMorristown Medical CenterDGDavid Y. GrahamUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore

Key Points

  • The aim is to compare the benefits and gastrointestinal risks of low-dose aspirin in preventing thromboembolic events.
  • Conducted a meta-analysis of 6 trials involving 6300 patients

Structured PICO

Does low-dose aspirin reduce mortality and thromboembolic events at the cost of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients requiring secondary prevention?

P
Population
6,300 patients across 6 trials requiring secondary prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular thromboembolic events
I
Intervention
Low-dose aspirin (≤325 mg/d)
C
Comparator
Placebo
O
Outcome
All-cause mortality and gastrointestinal tract bleedinghard clinical

Low-dose aspirin for secondary prevention has a favorable benefit-to-risk profile, preventing one death for every 67 patients treated while causing one nonfatal GI bleed for every 100 treated.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In spite of the clear evidence of benefit of aspirin in the secondary prevention of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular thrombotic events, its use in patients at high risk due to a previous event remains suboptimal. A possible explanation for this underuse is concern regarding the relative benefit in relation to the potential risk for serious gastrointestinal events. OBJECTIVE: To compare the benefit and gastrointestinal risk of aspirin use for the secondary prevention of thromboembolic events. DESIGN: A meta-analysis was conducted using 6 trials (6300 patients) meeting the inclusion requirement of use of low-dose aspirin (< or =325 mg/d) in approved secondary prevention indications. RESULTS: Aspirin reduced all-cause mortality by 18%. In addition, aspirin use reduced the number of strokes by 20%, myocardial infarctions by 30%, and other "vascular events" by 30%. Alternately, patients who took aspirin were 2.5 times more likely than those in the placebo group to have gastrointestinal tract bleeding. The number needed to treat for aspirin to prevent 1 death from any cause of mortality was 67, while 100 needed to be treated to detect 1 nonfatal gastrointestinal tract bleeding. CONCLUSION: Aspirin use for the secondary prevention of thromboembolic events has a favorable benefit-to-risk profile and should be encouraged in those at high risk.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Weisman et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d3cf77328fa9a742f2f7ahttps://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.162.19.2197
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Hemorrhagic Complications Associated With Aspirin2012 · 16 citations
  2. 2Low-dose aspirin in primary prevention: cardioprotection, chemoprevention, both, or neither?2013 · 75 citations
  3. 3Aspirin for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force2002 · 635 citations
  4. 4Aspirin Therapy for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials2004 · 2 citations
  5. 5A Critical Analysis1995 · 644 citations