PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 3, 2002BMJ217 citationsOpen Access

Natural experiment examining impact of aggressive screening and treatment on prostate cancer mortality in two fixed cohorts from Seattle area and Connecticut

GLGrace L. Lu‐YaoPAPeter C. AlbertsenJSJanet L. Stanford

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the more intensive screening and treatment for prostate cancer in the Seattle-Puget Sound area in 1987-90 led to lower mortality from prostate cancer than in Connecticut. DESIGN: Natural experiment comparing two fixed cohorts from 1987 to 1997. SETTING: Seattle-Puget Sound and Connecticut surveillance, epidemiology, and end results areas. PARTICIPANTS: Population based cohorts of male Medicare beneficiaries aged 65-79 drawn from the Seattle (n=94 900) and Connecticut (n=120 621) areas. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of screening for prostate cancer, treatment with radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy, and prostate cancer specific mortality. RESULTS: The prostate specific antigen testing rate in Seattle was 5.39 (95% confidence interval 4.76 to 6.11) times that of Connecticut, and the prostate biopsy rate was 2.20 (1.81 to 2.68) times that of Connecticut during 1987-90. The 10 year cumulative incidences of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy up to 1996 were 2.7% and 3.9% for Seattle cohort members compared with 0.5% and 3.1% for Connecticut cohort members. The adjusted rate ratio of prostate cancer mortality up to 1997 was 1.03 (0.95 to 1.11) in Seattle compared with Connecticut. CONCLUSION: More intensive screening for prostate cancer and treatment with radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy among Medicare beneficiaries in the Seattle area than in the Connecticut area was not associated with lower prostate cancer specific mortality over 11 years of follow up.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lu‐Yao et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1de06aa44226b57c601c87https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7367.740
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Regression Models and Life-Tables1972 · 39,703 citations
  2. 2Generalized Linear Models (2nd ed.).1993 · 4,953 citations
  3. 3Regression Models and Life-Tables1992 · 26,658 citations
  4. 4Generalized Linear Models1992 · 2,430 citations
  5. 5Accuracy of cancer death certificates and its effect on cancer mortality statistics.1981 · 710 citations