PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2001International Affairs311 citations

Making the IMF and the World Bank more Accountable*

View Full Paper
NWNgaire Woods

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank (the Bank)1 are now regularly accused of being secretive, unaccountable and ineffective. Not only radical non-governmental organizations (NGOs) but equally their major shareholders are demanding that the institutions become more transparent, more accountable and more participatory. Accountability, in particular, has become the catchcry of officials, scholars and activists in discussing the reform of the institutions. Yet few attempts have been made to dissect the existing structure of accountability within the international financial institutions (IFIs), to explain its flaws and to propose solutions. That is the aim of this article. The first section examines the structure of accountability planned by the founders of the IMF and the World Bank. The second section discusses the defects in this structure. Section three analyses recent attempts to make the institutions more accountable. The conclusion offers some recommendations for improving the institutions, and a warning about the limits of accountability at the international level.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ngaire Woods (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1e15234dc08b4b569fd3bfhttps://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00179
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper