Telephone counselling for smoking cessation

Background: Telephone services can provide information and support for smokers. Counselling may be provided proactively or offered reactively to callers to smoking cessation helplines.: To evaluate the effect of telephone support to help smokers quit, including proactive or reactive counselling, or the provision of other information to smokers calling a helpline. methods: We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group Specialised Register, clinicaltrials. gov, and the ICTRP for studies of telephone counselling, using search terms including 'hotlines' or 'quitline' or 'helpline'. Date of the most recent search: May 2018. criteria: Randomised or quasi‐randomised controlled trials which offered proactive or reactive telephone counselling to smokers to assist smoking cessation. collection and analysis: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We pooled studies using a random‐effects model and assessed statistical heterogeneity amongst subgroups of clinically comparable studies using the I2 statistic. In trials including smokers who did not call a quitline, we used meta‐regression to investigate moderation of the effect of telephone counselling by the planned number of calls in the intervention, trial selection of participants that were motivated to quit, and the baseline support provided together with telephone counselling (either self‐help only, brief face‐to‐face intervention, pharmacotherapy, or financial incentives). results: We identified 104 trials including 111, 653 participants that met the inclusion criteria. Participants were mostly adult smokers from the general population, but some studies included teenagers, pregnant women, and people with long‐term or mental health conditions. Most trials (58. 7%) were at high risk of bias, while 30. 8% were at unclear risk, and only 11. 5% were at low risk of bias for all domains assessed. Most studies (100/104) assessed proactive telephone counselling, as opposed to reactive forms. trials including smokers who contacted helplines (32, 484 participants), quit rates were higher for smokers receiving multiple sessions of proactive counselling (risk ratio (RR) 1. 38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1. 19 to 1. 61; 14 trials, 32, 484 participants; I2 = 72%) compared with a control condition providing self‐help materials or brief counselling in a single call. Due to the substantial unexplained heterogeneity between studies, we downgraded the certainty of the evidence to moderate. studies that recruited smokers who did not call a helpline, the provision of telephone counselling increased quit rates (RR 1. 25, 95% CI 1. 15 to 1. 35; 65 trials, 41, 233 participants; I2 = 52%). Due to the substantial unexplained heterogeneity between studies, we downgraded the certainty of the evidence to moderate. In subgroup analysis, we found no evidence that the effect of telephone counselling depended upon whether or not other interventions were provided (P = 0. 21), no evidence that more intensive support was more effective than less intensive (P = 0. 43), or that the effect of telephone support depended upon whether or not people were actively trying to quit smoking (P = 0. 32). However, in meta‐regression, telephone counselling was associated with greater effectiveness when provided as an adjunct to self‐help written support (P ' conclusions: There is moderate‐certainty evidence that proactive telephone counselling aids smokers who seek help from quitlines, and moderate‐certainty evidence that proactive telephone counselling increases quit rates in smokers in other settings. There is currently insufficient evidence to assess potential variations in effect from differences in the number of contacts, type or timing of telephone counselling, or when telephone counselling is provided as an adjunct to other smoking cessation therapies. Evidence was inconclusive on the effect of reactive telephone counselling, due to a limited number studies, which reflects the difficulty of studying this intervention.