PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 13, 2025Current Vascular Pharmacology2 citations

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in Morbidly Obese Patients (BMI \>40 kg/m2): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

View Full Paper
ΜSΜarios SagrisNKNikolaos KtenopoulosKPKonstantinos Pamporis

Key Result

Among 119,960 morbidly obese patients, DOAC use was significantly associated with lower all-cause mortality and major bleeding risk compared to warfarin.

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=119,960)

Structured PICO

Do direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) improve efficacy and safety outcomes compared to warfarin in morbidly obese patients (BMI >40 kg/m2) with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism?

P
Population
119,960 morbidly obese patients (BMI >40 kg/m2) with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism on oral anticoagulation therapy across 24 studies.
I
Intervention
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
C
Comparator
Warfarin
O
Outcome
All-cause mortality, major and minor bleeding, stroke/systemic embolism (SE), VTE, and their composite endpointcomposite

DOACs demonstrate a potentially safer and more effective profile than warfarin in morbidly obese patients (BMI >40 kg/m2), challenging current guidelines that advise caution with DOACs in this population.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines and consensus statements advise caution in using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for morbidly obese patients with body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m2, indicating warfarin as the most studied treatment. METHODS: and atrial fibrillation (AF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE). The outcomes of allcause mortality, major and minor bleeding, stroke/systematic embolism (SE), VTE, and their composite endpoint were analyzed using a random-effects model. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 24 studies and 119,960 morbidly obese patients with AF or VTE on oral anticoagulation therapy: 51,363 on DOACs (43%) vs. (57%) 68,597 on warfarin. DOAC use was significantly associated with lower all-cause mortality and major bleeding risk compared to warfarin. Although the risk of composite endpoint, stroke/SE, and VTE was lower in the DOAC group, no statistically significant difference was observed, indicating no superiority of warfarin compared to DOAC use. The risk of minor bleeding events, hemorrhagic stroke, and ischemic stroke was lower in the DOAC compared to the warfarin group. The same trend favoring DOACs over warfarin in all assessed endpoints was observed in the subgroup analysis based on anticoagulation indication (AF or VTE). CONCLUSION: Our findings have documented a potentially more effective and safer profile of DOACs compared to warfarin in morbidly obese patients regardless of the indication for anticoagulation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sagris et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism in morbidly obese patients (n=119,960). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Warfarin was evaluated on All-cause mortality, major and minor bleeding, stroke/systematic embolism (SE), VTE, and their composite endpoint. Among 119,960 morbidly obese patients, DOAC use was significantly associated with lower all-cause mortality and major bleeding risk compared to warfarin.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1f6d94fe2692e41a2ad516https://doi.org/10.2174/0115701611330090250130075810
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper