Population-based studies reported significantly higher 30-day mortality rates for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (7.4-8.2%) compared to hospital-based studies (3.5-3.8%).
Systematic Review (n=37,654)
Does study design influence reported mortality and morbidity rates after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair?
Reported mortality rates for elective AAA surgery are significantly higher in population-based studies compared to hospital-based studies, highlighting the influence of study design on surgical outcomes reporting.
Absolute Event Rate: 8.2% vs 3.8%
BACKGROUND: The mortality and morbidity rates of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery, as reported over the past 12 years, were graded and analysed by levels of evidence. METHODS: Articles on elective AAA surgery published between 1985 and 1996 were retrieved and classified into five levels of evidence. Level 1 contains prospective studies and is subdivided into population-based (level 1a) and hospital-based (level 1b) studies. Level 2 includes retrospective studies, subdivided into population-based studies (level 2a), hospital-based studies (level 2b) and hospital-based studies concerning a specified group of selected patients (level 2c). Operative mortality and systemic and local/vascular complication rates with 95 per cent confidence intervals were calculated for each level of evidence. RESULTS: Seventy-two articles describing a total of 37 654 patients could be included: two level 1a studies (692 patients), nine level 1b studies (1677 patients), 13 level 2a studies (21 409 patients), 32 level 2b studies (12019 patients) and 16 level 2c studies (1857 patients). The mean 30-day mortality rates of the two population-based levels were similar: 8.2 (95 per cent confidence interval 6.4-10.6) per cent for the prospective (la) and 7.4 (7.0-7.7) per cent for the retrospective (2a) series. These figures were significantly higher than the remarkably similar hospital-based mortality rates: 3.8 (3.0-4.8) per cent for the prospective (1b), 3.8 (3.5-4.2) per cent for the retrospective (2b) and 3.5 (2.8-4.4) per cent for selected patient group (2c) studies. The most frequent complication was of cardiac origin. In the population-based series the cardiac complication rates were 10.6 (8.5-13.2) and 11.1 (9.1-13.6) per cent for levels 1a and 2a respectively. This compared well with 12.0 (10.5-13.9) per cent for the prospective hospital-based series (level 1b). The cardiac complication rates in the retrospective hospital-based studies were significantly lower: 8.9 (8.4-9.5) and 6.1 (4.9-7.6) per cent for levels 2b and 2c respectively. CONCLUSION: There is a clear and consistent disagreement in reported mortality rates between hospital-based and population-based studies of elective surgery for AAA. Prospective studies give the best documentation of postoperative morbidity.
Blankensteijn et al. (Tue,) conducted a systematic review in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) (n=37,654). Population-based study design vs. Hospital-based study design was evaluated on 30-day mortality rate. Population-based studies reported significantly higher 30-day mortality rates for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (7.4-8.2%) compared to hospital-based studies (3.5-3.8%).