Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: To examine the influence of family affluence (measure of socioeconomic status), school environment (liking school, school pressure, academic achievement and classmates support) and peer group (size of the peer group and frequency of peer contact) on unhealthy behaviours (smoking, drunkenness, physical inactivity, irregular breakfast and soft drink consumption) and health outcomes (self-rated health, multiple health complaints and life satisfaction) in Croatian pupils. METHODS: The Croatian data from Health Behaviour in School-aged Children 2005/06 (HBSC) were used (1666 11-year-olds, and 1630 15-year-olds). Binary logistic regression analysis was conducted (95% confidence intervals, P < 0.05 and P < 0.01). RESULTS: School environment and peer group were connected to more unhealthy behaviours along with greater differences in those behaviours than family affluence. The only exception was physical inactivity at age 11 (compared to high family affluence, low family affluence increased 80% odds for physical inactivity, whereas, compared to favourable school environment, poor school environment increased 50% odds). Compared to favourable school environment, poor school environment was the most consistent and strongest predictor of poor health outcomes (all three measures). No influence of peer group to health outcomes was found. Compared to high-affluent families, low-affluent families were associated to higher odds for poor self-rated health and life dissatisfaction, and, for 11-year-olds, medium-affluent families to lower odds for multiple health complaints. Gender differences in unhealthy behaviours and health outcomes were also found. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to socioeconomic inequalities, greater inequalities in unhealthy behaviours were connected to school environment and peer group, and in health outcomes to school environment.
Šimetin et al. (Tue,) studied this question.