PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 28, 2002European Journal of Heart Failure150 citations

Simultaneous vs. Sequential Biventricular Pacing in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: An Acute Hemodynamic Study

View Full Paper
GPGiovanni Battista PeregoRCRoberto ChiancaMFMario Facchini

Structured PICO

Does sequential biventricular pacing improve maximum LV dP/dt compared to simultaneous biventricular pacing in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and intraventricular conduction delay?

P
Population
12 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and intraventricular conduction delay
I
Intervention
Sequential biventricular pacing with optimized atrioventricular and interventricular delays (VVi intervals ranging from -60 to +40 ms)
C
Comparator
Simultaneous biventricular pacing
O
Outcome
Maximum LV dP/dt (rate of change of left ventricular pressure)surrogate

Sequential biventricular pacing, particularly when the left ventricle is stimulated before the right ventricle, provides a greater acute increase in LV dP/dt compared to simultaneous pacing in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

Abstract

AIMS: Simultaneous biventricular pacing improves left ventricular (LV) systolic performance in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and intraventricular conduction delay. We tested the hypothesis that further improvements can be obtained using sequential biventricular pacing by optimizing both atrioventricular and interventricular delays. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 12 patients, LV pressure, right ventricular (RV) pressure and respective rates of change of pressure (dP/dt) were acutely measured during biventricular pacing with different atrioventricular and interventricular (VVi) intervals ranging from -60 to +40 ms. The average increase vs. baseline in maximum LV dP/dt was higher for sequential than for simultaneous biventricular pacing (VDD mode: 35+/-20 vs. 29+/-18%, P<0.01; DDD mode: 38+/-23 vs. 34+/-25%, P<0.01), with a minority of patients accounting for most of the difference. The mean optimal VVi was -25+/-21 ms in VDD mode and -25+/-26 ms in DDD mode. With these settings, RV dP/dt was not significantly different from baseline. QRS shortening was not predictive of LV dP/dt increase. CONCLUSION: A significant increase of LV dP/dt with no change in RV dP/dt can be obtained by sequential biventricular pacing as compared to simultaneous biventricular pacing. The highest LV dP/dt is achieved when LV is stimulated before RV. The hemodynamic advantage might be of clinical significance in selected cases.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Perego et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a205cab1ce0fe566a5ad601https://doi.org/10.1016/s1388-9842(02)00204-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper