Acute exposure to e-cigarettes with nicotine, but not without nicotine or sham, caused a significant shift in cardiac sympathovagal balance towards sympathetic predominance.
Does acute exposure to e-cigarettes with nicotine increase cardiac sympathetic nerve activity and oxidative stress compared to non-nicotine e-cigarettes or sham control in healthy non-smokers?
Acute e-cigarette use increases cardiac sympathetic nerve activity due to inhaled nicotine, not non-nicotine constituents, without acutely increasing oxidative stress.
Background Chronic electronic (e) cigarette users have increased resting cardiac sympathetic nerve activity and increased susceptibility to oxidative stress. The purpose of the present study is to determine the role of nicotine versus non‐nicotine constituents in e‐cigarette emissions in causing these pathologies in otherwise healthy humans. Methods and Results Thirty‐three healthy volunteers who were not current e‐cigarette or tobacco cigarette smokers were studied. On different days, each participant used an e‐cigarette with nicotine, an e‐cigarette without nicotine, or a sham control. Cardiac sympathetic nerve activity was determined by heart rate variability, and susceptibility to oxidative stress was determined by plasma paraoxonase activity. Following exposure to the e‐cigarette with nicotine, but not to the e‐cigarette without nicotine or the sham control, there was a significant and marked shift in cardiac sympathovagal balance towards sympathetic predominance. The decrease in high‐frequency component and the increases in the low‐frequency component and the low‐frequency to high‐frequency ratio were significantly greater following exposure to the e‐cigarette with nicotine compared with exposure to the e‐cigarette without nicotine or to sham control. Oxidative stress, as estimated by plasma paraoxonase, did not increase following any of the 3 exposures. Conclusions The acute sympathomimetic effect of e‐cigarettes is attributable to the inhaled nicotine, not to non‐nicotine constituents in e‐cigarette aerosol, recapitulating the same heart rate variability pattern associated with increased cardiac risk in multiple populations with and without known cardiac disease. Evidence of oxidative stress, as estimated by plasma paraoxonase activity, was not uncovered following acute e‐cigarette exposure.
Moheimani et al. (Thu,) conducted a other in Healthy volunteers (n=33). E-cigarette with nicotine vs. E-cigarette without nicotine and sham control was evaluated on Cardiac sympathetic nerve activity (by heart rate variability) and oxidative stress (by plasma paraoxonase activity). Acute exposure to e-cigarettes with nicotine, but not without nicotine or sham, caused a significant shift in cardiac sympathovagal balance towards sympathetic predominance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: