Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper identifies four misconceptions about language proficiency which are currently impeding the implementation of effective bilingual education programs. These misconceptions involve: 1) the attribution of deficient language or cognitive skills on the basis of non-standard varieties of L1, and the consequent attempt to eradicate these stigmatized varieties; 2) the attribution of “English proficiency” to language minority students on the basis of adequate surface structure in “context-embedded” face-to-face communicative situations, with the result that low English academic performance in “context-reduced” communicative situations is attributed to deficient cognitive abilities; 3) the belief that L1 and L2 proficiencies are separate rather than manifestations of a common underlying proficiency; 4) the belief that a home-school language switch, or “linguistic mismatch”, is the major cause of language minority students’ academic failure.
Jim Cummins (Wed,) studied this question.