Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy significantly decreased surgeon heart rate and heart rate variability compared to conventional laparoscopy.
RCT
Does robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduce surgeon heart rate and heart rate variability compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy?
Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy significantly reduces the physical and mental strain (measured by heart rate and HRV) on surgeons compared to conventional laparoscopy.
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery might be beneficial for the patient, but it imposes increased physical and mental strain on the surgeon. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery addresses some of the laparoscopic drawbacks and may potentially reduce mental strain. This could reduce the risk of surgeon's fatigue, mishaps and strain-induced illnesses, which may eventually improve the safety of laparoscopic surgical procedures. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, a randomized study was performed, comparing both heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV) of the surgeon as a measure of total and mental strain, respectively, during conventional and robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Both heart rate and HRV (the low-frequency band/high-frequency band ratio) were significantly decreased when using robotic assistance. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest the use of the daVinci® Surgical System leads to less physical and mental strain of the surgeon during surgery. However, assessing mental strain by means of HRV is cumbersome since there is no clear cutoff point or scale for maximum tolerated strain levels and its related effects on surgeon's health.
Heemskerk et al. (Wed,) conducted a rct in Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs. Conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy was evaluated on Heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV). Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy significantly decreased surgeon heart rate and heart rate variability compared to conventional laparoscopy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: