PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 1987Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology35 citations

Assessment of the Work Capacity and Relationship Between Rate Response and Exercise Tolerance Associated With Activity‐Sensing Rate‐Responsive Ventricular Pacing

View Full Paper
SÆSVEIN F ÆRESTRANDKBKJELL BREIVIKOOOle‐Jørgen Ohm

Structured PICO

Does activity-sensing rate-responsive ventricular pacing improve symptom-limited maximum treadmill time compared to fixed rate VVI pacing in patients with pacemakers?

P
Population
15 patients (mean age, 73 years) who had received rate-responsive ventricular pacemakers for indications including atrioventricular block, sino-atrial block, and atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular response.
I
Intervention
Activity-sensing rate-responsive ventricular pacing (VVI + activity mode, RRP) with basic rate programmed to 60 ppm, rate response to 5, and activity threshold to medium.
C
Comparator
Fixed rate VVI pacing with basic rate programmed to 60 ppm.
O
Outcome
Symptom-limited maximum treadmill time (MTT).surrogate

Activity-sensing rate-responsive ventricular pacing significantly improves exercise tolerance compared to fixed-rate VVI pacing in patients with bradyarrhythmias.

Abstract

The relationship between rate response and exercise tolerance was studied by measuring the symptom-limited maximum treadmill time (MTT)both during fixed rate VVI pacing and during VVI + activity mode pacing (RRP) in 15 patients (mean age, 73 years) who had received rate-responsive ventricular pacemakers. Their indications were atrioventricular block, sino-atrial block, and atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular response. Basic rate was programmed to 60 ppm in both pacing modes; rate response and activity threshold were programmed to 5 and medium, respectively. The order in which the two pacing modes were tested was randomly determined. The MTT was, on average, 29% longer in RRP than in VVI mode with a mean of 12 minutes in VVI and 14.8 minutes in RRP (p less than 0.001). For the subgroup of eight patients with paced-only rhythm the average increase in MTT was 38% with a mean of 9.5 minutes in VVI and 12.8 minutes in RRP (p less than 0.01). Seven patients who showed episodes of spontaneous rhythm, increased their average MTT by 17% (mean in VVI, 14.9 minutes; in RRP, 17.1 minutes; p less than 0.02). During RRP, a significant positive correlation existed between MTT and the increase in heart rate (N = 15; r = 0.83; p less than 0.001). In 12 patients with paced-only rhythm, the pacing rate remained at the programmed basic rate when the patients were lying, sitting, and standing and increased to 86 +/- 4 ppm during casual walking, and to 101 +/- 4 ppm during jumping up and down with the pacemaker programmed to the above-mentioned parameters. The maximum pacing rate during jumping corresponded with the maximum pacing rates measured from Holter recordings during normal daily activities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

ÆRESTRAND et al. (1987) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20e79a6dd54ee3d3eb2352https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1987.tb04964.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper