PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2001EP Europace22 citationsOpen Access

Initial clinical experience with a new arrhythmia detection algorithm in dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators

View Full Paper
DTDamj TheunsErasmus University Rotterdam

Key Result

The SMART Detection algorithm achieved 100% sensitivity and 95.6% accuracy for discriminating ventricular tachycardia from supraventricular tachycardia.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=26)

Structured PICO

Does the SMART Detection™ algorithm accurately discriminate ventricular tachycardia from supraventricular tachycardia in patients with dual chamber ICDs?

P
Population
26 patients receiving a non-thoracotomy ICD system, followed for a mean of 8 months to evaluate arrhythmia episodes.
E
Exposure
SMART Detection™ tachycardia discrimination algorithm
O
Outcome
Performance of the tachycardia discrimination algorithm (sensitivity and accuracy for discriminating VT from SVT)surrogate

The SMART Detection algorithm in dual chamber ICDs demonstrates high sensitivity and accuracy in discriminating ventricular from supraventricular tachycardias, which may help reduce inappropriate therapies.

Abstract

Inappropriate therapy, due to poor discrimination of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) from ventricular tachycardia (VT) remains a major problem in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Theoretically, the addition of atrial sensing in discrimination algorithms should improve this differentiation. The aim of the study is to evaluate the performance of a new tachycardia discrimination algorithm, SMART Detection™. Twenty-six patients received a non-thoracotomy ICD system (Phylax AV, Biotronik, Germany). All documented spontaneous arrhythmia episodes were analyzed. During a mean follow-up of 8 months, a total number of 139 events with stored electrograms were recorded in 12 patients. The final diagnosis was ventricular fibrillation (VF) or polymorphic VT (n=20), monomorphic VT (n=69), SVT (n=26), other ventricular arrhythmia (n=3) and T wave oversensing (n=21). In 6 episodes a dual tachycardia was present. Considering SVT episodes, inappropriate therapy occurred in 2 cases of atrial flutter due to stable ventricular rate (10%). With the SMART Detection™ algorithm, discrimination of VT from SVT achieved a sensitivity of 100%, with an accuracy of 95·6% for all ventricular arrhythmias. In the case of SVT, the algorithm appropriately detected and inhibited therapy in 88% of atrial fibrillation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Damj Theuns (2001) conducted an observational in Patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) (n=26). SMART Detection algorithm was evaluated on Accuracy of discriminating ventricular tachycardia from supraventricular tachycardia. The SMART Detection algorithm achieved 100% sensitivity and 95.6% accuracy for discriminating ventricular tachycardia from supraventricular tachycardia.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a211c58a37b8f8d92968c5ahttps://doi.org/10.1053/eupc.2001.0171
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper