PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2019Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions55 citationsOpen Access

Quantitative flow ratio for immediate assessment of nonculprit lesions in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction—An iSTEMI substudy

MSMartin Sejr‐HansenJWJelmer WestraTTTroels Thim

Key Result

Acute QFR demonstrated a 93% classification agreement with staged QFR, 84% with staged FFR, and 74% with staged iFR for assessing nonculprit lesions in STEMI patients.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=112)

Blinding

Blinded core-lab analysis

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does acute quantitative flow ratio (QFR) assessment accurately evaluate nonculprit lesions in patients with STEMI compared to staged QFR, FFR, and iFR?

P
Population
112 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and nonculprit lesions who underwent acute and staged functional assessment at a median of 13 days.
E
Exposure
Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) assessment of nonculprit lesions based on acute setting angiograms
C
Comparator
Staged setting (median 13 days) assessment using QFR, fractional flow reserve (FFR), and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR)
O
Outcome
Diagnostic performance (classification agreement) of acute QFR compared to staged QFR, FFR, and iFRsurrogate

Acute QFR assessment of nonculprit lesions in STEMI patients shows very good diagnostic agreement with staged QFR and good agreement with staged FFR, supporting its potential utility for immediate functional evaluation.

Main Result

Effect estimate: 93% agreement (95% CI 87-99)

Limitations

  • Angiograms were not obtained specifically for QFR analysis, resulting in a low feasibility rate.
  • Exclusions based on anatomical and angiographic criteria reduced the statistical power of the substudy.
  • The prognostic value of QFR-guided revascularization cannot be assessed from this dataset.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) assessment of nonculprit lesions (NCLs) based on acute setting angiograms obtained in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with QFR, fractional flow reserve (FFR), and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) in the staged setting as reference. BACKGROUND: QFR is an angiography-based approach for the functional evaluation of coronary artery lesions. METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis of the iSTEMI study. NCLs were assessed with iFR in the acute setting and with iFR and FFR at staged (median 13 days) follow-up. Acute and staged QFR values were computed in a core laboratory based on the coronary angiography recordings. Diagnostic cut-off values were ≤0.80 for QFR and FFR, and ≤0.89 for iFR. RESULTS: Staged iFR and FFR data were available for 146 NCLs in 112 patients in the iSTEMI study. Among these, QFR analysis was feasible in 103 (71%) lesions assessed in the acute setting with a mean QFR value of 0.82 (IQR: 0.73-0.91). Staged QFR, FFR, and iFR were 0.80 (IQR: 0.70-0.90), 0.81 (IQR: 0.71-0.88), and 0.91 (IQR: 0.87-0.96), respectively. Classification agreement of acute and staged QFR was 93% (95%Cl: 87-99). The classification agreement of acute QFR was 84% (95%CI: 76-90) using staged FFR as reference and 74% (95%CI: 65-83) using staged iFR as reference. CONCLUSIONS: Acute QFR showed a very good diagnostic performance with staged QFR as reference, a good diagnostic performance with staged FFR as reference, and a moderate diagnostic performance with staged iFR as reference.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sejr‐Hansen et al. (2019) conducted an observational in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with nonculprit lesions (n=112). Acute Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) vs. Staged QFR, FFR, and iFR was evaluated on Classification agreement of acute QFR with staged QFR (93% agreement, 95% CI 87-99). Acute QFR demonstrated a 93% classification agreement with staged QFR, 84% with staged FFR, and 74% with staged iFR for assessing nonculprit lesions in STEMI patients.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a219b42153b2036cbf1e44fhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28208
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Evolving Future of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve2017 · 206 citations
  2. 2Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography2016 · 601 citations
  3. 3Nonculprit Stenosis Evaluation Using Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction2017 · 71 citations
  4. 4Staged re-evaluation of non-culprit lesions in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: a retrospective study2016 · 8 citations
  5. 5Quantitative Flow Ratio Identifies Nonculprit Coronary Lesions Requiring Revascularization in Patients With ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease2018 · 100 citations