PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 2003Hypertension118 citationsOpen Access

Renoprotection by ACE Inhibition or Aldosterone Blockade Is Blood Pressure–Dependent

View Full Paper
KGKaren A. GriffinLoyola University Medical CenterIAIsam Abu‐AmarahLoyola University Medical CenterMPMaria M. PickenLoyola University Medical Center

Key Result

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade with enalapril or aldactone prevented severe blood pressure increases and corresponding renal damage in salt-supplemented hypertensive rats.

Key Points

  • This research aims to determine whether renal protection through renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade is dependent on blood pressure levels.
  • Performed BP radiotelemetry for 8 weeks in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRsp).
  • Administered either tap water or 1% NaCl; treated with enalapril or aldactone, or left untreated.
  • Measured systolic BP and assessed renal damage histologically at 8 weeks.
  • Untreated saline-drinking SHRsp had significantly higher BP (215+/-6 mm Hg) than treated groups (aldactone: 198+/-4 mm Hg, enalapril: 173+/-1 mm Hg).
  • Histological damage correlated highly with BP (r=0.8, P<0.001, n=41).
  • Renal damage scores exceeded 5 only in SHRsp with BP over 200 mm Hg, indicating a clear threshold.

Structured PICO

Does enalapril or aldactone prevent renal damage independently of blood pressure in salt-supplemented stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats?

P
Population
41 approximately 10-week-old male stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats followed for 8 weeks.
I
Intervention
Enalapril (50 mg/L) in drinking fluid (n=9) or subcutaneous implantation of time-release 200-mg pellets of aldactone (n=10) for 8 weeks.
C
Comparator
Untreated saline-drinking SHRsp (n=12) and tap water-drinking SHRsp (n=10).
O
Outcome
Average systolic blood pressure measured by radiotelemetry and histological renal damage scores at 8 weeks.surrogate

Renoprotection by RAAS blockade in salt-supplemented stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats is blood pressure-dependent, highlighting the limitations of conventional tail-cuff BP measurements.

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.05

Abstract

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade has been shown to protect against renal damage in salt-supplemented, stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRsp). Based on intermittent tail-cuff blood pressure (BP) measurements, it has been claimed that such protection is BP-independent and mediated by a blockade of the direct tissue-damaging effects of angiotensin and/or aldosterone. BP radiotelemetry was performed for 8 weeks in approximately 10-week-old male SHRsp who received a standard diet and either tap water (n=10) or 1% NaCl to drink. Saline-drinking SHRsp were either left untreated (n=12), received enalapril (50 mg/L) in drinking fluid (n=9), or had subcutaneous implantation of time-release 200-mg pellets of aldactone (n=10). The average systolic BP (mean+/-SEM) during the final 3 weeks was significantly higher (P5 was only observed in SHRsp whose average systolic BP during the final 3 weeks exceeded 200 mm Hg, indicating a threshold relation with BP. These data show that protection by renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade in this model is BP-dependent and mediated by preventing the severe increases in BP seen in untreated salt-supplemented SHRsp and further underscore the limitations of interpretations based on conventional tail-cuff BP measurements.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Griffin et al. (2003) studied Hypertension and renal damage (n=41). Enalapril or aldactone vs. Untreated saline-drinking or tap water-drinking was evaluated on Average systolic BP during the final 3 weeks (p=<0.05). Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade with enalapril or aldactone prevented severe blood pressure increases and corresponding renal damage in salt-supplemented hypertensive rats.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a22cc3a93662977598de66chttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.0000049881.25304.73
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper