March 10, 2025Open Access

Post-Dobbs Decision Changes in Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinical Workforce in States With Abortion Restrictions

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This case-control study compares the availability of women’s health care clinicians in states that enacted highly restrictive abortion policy after the Dobbs Supreme Court decision vs states that established abortion legislation before the Dobbs decision.

Read Full Paperexternally

AI से पूछें

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhu et al. (Mon,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a239b64b7e293e61ca5fd8b https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.8149

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Global workforce implications of Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization2024 · 2 citations
2Trends in Maternal Death Post-Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health2024 · 10 citations
3Use of Oral and Emergency Contraceptives After the US Supreme Court’s Dobbs Decision2024 · 36 citations
4Longitudinal Impact of Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization on Abortion Service Delivery in Ohio, 2022‒20232024 · 5 citations
5The Pregnancy-Related Mortality Impact of a Total Abortion Ban in the United States: A Research Note on Increased Deaths Due to Remaining Pregnant2021 · 164 citations

AI से पूछें

Bookmark

View Full Paper