PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 1993Cancer113 citations

Screening for lung cancer: The Mayo lung project revisited

View Full Paper
BFBetty J. FlehingerMKMarek KimmelTPTatyana Polyak

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Mayo Lung Project (MLP) reported lung cancer incidence and mortality in a population offered chest radiographs and sputum cytologic screening examinations every 4 months and a population offered only the Mayo Clinic advice to undergo annual examination. No mortality benefit attributable to screening was observed after 6 years of observation and at least 1 year of follow-up. METHODS: The authors describe a simulation study designed to estimate from Mayo data the parameters in a mathematical model of the natural history of lung cancer and to estimate the potential benefit associated with periodic screening of high-risk people starting at 45 years of age. RESULTS: It was found that the mean duration of Stage I non-small cell lung cancer is at least 4 years and that rates of Stage I detectability and curability are less than 25% and 35%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A trial of the magnitude, duration, and contamination of the MLP would have a less than 20% probability of showing significant benefit from screening; however, long-term annual screening might result in a modest decrease in lung cancer mortality, ranging from 0% to 13%. A greater benefit would accrue from improved detection and treatment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Flehinger et al. (1993) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2636140e5ad7423bc47f64https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19930901)72:5<1573::aid-cncr2820720514>3.0.co;2-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper