PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 10, 2026The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism1 citations

Pancreatic Fat and the Risk of Future Dysglycemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

View Full Paper
JYJie YangXZXi ZhangLLLi Luo

Key Result

Higher pancreatic fat burden was associated with an increased risk of incident type 2 diabetes (pooled effect estimate 2.56; 95% CI 1.27-5.14).

Key Points

  • This research evaluates how pancreatic fat relates to future type 2 diabetes and glycemic progression.
  • Systematic review of longitudinal observational studies
  • Included studies assessed pancreatic fat and reported incident type 2 diabetes or glycemic progression
  • Quality assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale
  • Higher pancreatic fat burden associated with incident type 2 diabetes (pooled effect estimate 2.56; 95% CI 1.27-5.14)
  • Association persisted with reduced heterogeneity after excluding one study (pooled effect estimate 1.45; 95% CI 1.23-1.73)
  • Pancreatic fat correlated with glycemic progression (effect estimate 1.96; 95% CI 1.10-3.48)

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis

Structured PICO

Does higher pancreatic fat burden predict incident type 2 diabetes and glycemic progression?

P
Population
10 longitudinal observational studies assessing the association of baseline pancreatic fat with incident type 2 diabetes and glycemic progression.
E
Exposure
Higher pancreatic fat burden
C
Comparator
Lower pancreatic fat burden
O
Outcome
Incident type 2 diabetes (T2D) and glycemic progressionsurrogate

Pancreatic fat is a potentially meaningful imaging-derived marker associated with adverse future glycemic outcomes, including incident type 2 diabetes.

Main Result

Effect estimate: Pooled effect estimate 2.56 (95% CI 1.27-5.14)

Limitations

  • High heterogeneity (I2 = 93.3%)
  • Differences in exposure ascertainment
  • Exposure scales were not directly comparable
  • High heterogeneity partly explained by differences in exposure ascertainment
  • Limited evidence in lean populations

Abstract

Abstract Context Pancreatic fat has emerged as a metabolically relevant ectopic fat depot, but its longitudinal association with future dysglycemic outcomes remains incompletely defined. Objective To evaluate the longitudinal association of pancreatic fat with incident type 2 diabetes (T2D) and glycemic progression, with exploratory narrative synthesis of evidence in lean populations. Data Sources PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 1, 2026. Study Selection Longitudinal observational studies assessing pancreatic fat at baseline and reporting subsequent incident T2D, glycemic progression, or both were included. Data Extraction Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data Synthesis Ten studies were included. In the primary binary meta-analysis (5 studies), higher pancreatic fat burden was associated with incident T2D (pooled effect estimate, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.27-5.14; I2 = 93.3%). Exclusion of 1 influential ultrasound-based study attenuated heterogeneity while preserving the association (pooled effect estimate, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.23-1.73; I2 = 10.2%). A separate continuous analysis (3 studies) also supported an association with incident T2D (1.17; 95% CI, 1.04-1.32; I2 = 79.2%), although exposure scales were not directly comparable. Pancreatic fat was also associated with glycemic progression (2 studies; 1.96; 95% CI, 1.10-3.48; I2 = 73.2%). Exploratory lean-population evidence was limited to 2 analytical contexts, synthesized narratively, and directionally consistent with the overall findings. Conclusions Pancreatic fat was associated with adverse future glycemic outcomes across multiple analytical contexts. These findings support pancreatic fat as a potentially meaningful imaging-derived marker of future dysglycemia, while suggesting that heterogeneity is partly explained by differences in exposure ascertainment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yang et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Incident type 2 diabetes and glycemic progression. Higher pancreatic fat burden vs. Lower pancreatic fat burden was evaluated on Incident type 2 diabetes (Pooled effect estimate 2.56, 95% CI 1.27-5.14). Higher pancreatic fat burden was associated with an increased risk of incident type 2 diabetes (pooled effect estimate 2.56; 95% CI 1.27-5.14).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2900ff6f82f25be989d715https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgag222
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper