Two-dimensional echocardiography compares well with radionuclide ventriculography for assessing ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction, with a mean difference of 0.4%.
Cross-Sectional (n=49)
Blinded observers
Does two-dimensional echocardiography provide comparable left ventricular ejection fraction measurements to radionuclide ventriculography in patients following acute myocardial infarction?
Two-dimensional echocardiography is a reliable alternative to radionuclide ventriculography for assessing LVEF post-MI, avoiding radiation exposure.
Mean Difference: 0.4 (95% CI -11.4–12.2)
p-value: p=not significantly different from zero
To compare the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction obtained by two-dimensional echocardiography and by radionuclide ventriculography in patients following acute myocardial infarction, 49 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction underwent echocardiography and radionuclide ventriculography on the same day, pre-discharge. Left ventricular ejection fraction was assessed by two blinded observers for each method and reproducibility was also assessed for each technique. The limits of agreement for the differences in ejection fraction (%) between the two methods was--11.4, 12.2; the mean difference 0.4 was not significantly different from zero. The limits of agreement for the intra- and inter-observer differences in ejection fraction by radionuclide ventriculography were--9.4, 7.6 and -8.6, 11.0, respectively; the mean differences--0.9 and 1.2 were not significantly different from zero. The limits of agreement for the intra- and inter-observer differences by echocardiography were--5.8, 6.6 and--8.9, 9.5 respectively; the mean differences 0.4 and 0.3 were not significantly different from zero. Thus, two-dimensional echocardiography compares well with radionuclide ventriculography for the assessment of ejection fraction without the disadvantage of radiation.
Senior et al. (Thu,) conducted a cross-sectional in Acute myocardial infarction (n=49). Two-dimensional echocardiography vs. Radionuclide ventriculography was evaluated on Difference in left ventricular ejection fraction (%) (Mean difference 0.4, 95% CI -11.4 to 12.2, p=not significantly different from zero). Two-dimensional echocardiography compares well with radionuclide ventriculography for assessing ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction, with a mean difference of 0.4%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: