PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 20, 2026Software1 citationsOpen Access

Iterative Audit Convergence in LLM-Managed Multi-Agent Systems: A Case Study in Prompt-Engineering Quality Assurance

View Full Paper
ECElias Calboreanu

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the quality and consistency of prompt specifications in multi-agent LLM systems through rigorous auditing.
  • Conducted a single-system case study on AEGIS, a seven-lane production pipeline.
  • Performed iterative, agent-driven audits across nine rounds, totaling 7152 lines of code.
  • Developed a seven-category taxonomy for defects and performed replication studies on a synthetic mini-specification.
  • Identified 51 consistency defects over nine rounds of auditing with varying per-round counts.
  • Achieved Cohen’s κ value of 0.80 for category agreement and 0.46 for severity in inter-rater reliability.
  • Cross-LLM panel detected all five seeded defects across major vendors with acceptable robustness.

Abstract

Prompt specifications for multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems carry data contracts and integration logic across interdependent files but are rarely subjected to structured-inspection rigor. We report a single-system case study of iterative, agent-driven auditing applied to AEGIS (Autonomous Engineering Governance and Intelligence System), a seven-lane production pipeline whose 7152-line specification surface was audited across nine rounds, surfacing 51 consistency defects (per-round counts of 15, 8, 12, 2, 8, 1, 4, 1, 0). We present a seven-category post hoc taxonomy with explicit coding rules, non-monotonic convergence consistent with cascading edits and audit-scope expansion, and a locked audit protocol. We further report two partial replications on a public synthetic mini-specification: a cross-LLM panel of four frontier vendors (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI; 12 traces; multi-vendor union detects all five seeded defects) and an inter-rater reliability check on a stratified subsample (Cohen’s κ = 0.80 on category, 0.46 on severity). The full reproducibility bundle accompanies the submission.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Elias Calboreanu (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a363123db0793dc1a53811ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/software5020026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1When LLMs Pass Tests but Fail the Process: A Constitutive Human-in-the-Loop Governance Framework for Multi-Agent LLM Software Development2026
  2. 2A Validation and Governance Framework for Multi-Agent LLM Scientific Software Development2026
  3. 3Artifact-Driven Methodology for LLM Coding Agents2026
  4. 4When LLMs Pass Tests but Fail the Process: Lessons from Governing a Multi-Agent Software Development Project2026
  5. 5Artifact-Driven Methodology for LLM Coding Agents2026