The Navier-Stokes existence and smoothness problem asks whether smooth, globally-defined solutions to the three-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations exist for all time, given smooth initial data, or whether finite-time singularities (blow-up) can develop. This is one of the seven Clay Mathematics Millennium Prize Problems, unsolved since Leray’s foundational work in 1934 R4. This paper demonstrates that the blow-up problem is dissolved — not solved — by the discrete relational framework of Pure Temporal Geometry (PTG). The key steps are: (1) We map the continuous Navier-Stokes variables to their discrete PTG counterparts. (2) We derive the Discrete Relational Navier-Stokes Equation from the master wave equation of Volume II. (3) We prove the Singularity Prevention Lemma: the discrete spatial gradient ∥∇disc Δ∥_∞ ≤ 2M < ∞ for all steps n ∈ ℕ, where M is set by the JUMP threshold of the temporal manifold. (4) We show that this bound is structurally enforced by the minimum relational tick δzᵢj ≥ 1, which prevents the denominator of the gradient from approaching zero. We conduct an explicit cross-check of all claims, identify the one conditional assumption (the boundedness of Δ via the JUMP threshold), and provide the Beale-Kato-Majda criterion R6 as the continuous-framework reference point against which the dissolution is measured. We close with the epistemological conclusion: the Navier-Stokes blow-up problem is an artefact of the continuous spatial assumption. In the correct discrete model, it does not arise.
Isong Otto Beseka (Sun,) studied this question.