PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2001Veterinary Record147 citations

Use of breed‐specific ranges for the vertebral heart scale as an aid to the radiographic diagnosis of cardiac disease in dogs

View Full Paper
CLChris LambHWH. WikeleyABAdrian Boswood

Key Result

The vertebral heart scale demonstrated relatively low sensitivity and specificity (58% to 83%) for diagnosing cardiac disease across six dog breeds, and was particularly inaccurate in boxers.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=320)

Structured PICO

Does the vertebral heart scale accurately diagnose cardiac disease in different dog breeds?

P
Population
320 dogs of six popular breeds, including normal dogs and those with cardiac or respiratory disease, evaluated using thoracic radiographs.
E
Exposure
Measurement of vertebral heart scale on right lateral recumbent thoracic radiographs
C
Comparator
Normal dogs of the same breed
O
Outcome
Sensitivity and specificity of the vertebral heart scale for distinguishing between dogs with and without cardiac diseasesurrogate

Breed-specific vertebral heart scale ranges have relatively low sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing cardiac disease in dogs, though accuracy varies significantly by breed and underlying disease type.

Abstract

The vertebral heart scale was measured on right lateral recumbent thoracic radiographs of 320 dogs of six popular breeds, including for each breed at least 20 dogs with no clinical signs of cardiovascular or respiratory disease and at least 19 dogs with cardiac or respiratory disease. There were significant differences between the mean values of the scale for the different breeds; the normal boxer dogs had a significantly higher mean value than the normal dogs of all the other breeds, and the labrador retrievers had a significantly higher mean value than all the other breeds except the boxer and the cavalier King Charles spaniel. For all the breeds except the boxer, there was a trend for dogs with cardiac disease (but not respiratory disease) to have higher mean values on the scale than normal dogs of the same breed; however, at the optimal value of the scale for distinguishing between dogs of each breed with and without cardiac disease, the sensitivity and specificity were relatively low, in the range 58 to 83 per cent. The scale was most accurate for the diagnosis of cardiac disease in the Yorkshire terrier and the cavalier King Charles spaniel, breeds affected by predominantly dilative forms of cardiac disease. In contrast, it was very inaccurate in the boxer, a breed that has a higher incidence of cardiac diseases associated with concentric hypertrophy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lamb et al. (2001) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiac disease (n=320). Vertebral heart scale vs. Normal dogs was evaluated on Diagnosis of cardiac disease. The vertebral heart scale demonstrated relatively low sensitivity and specificity (58% to 83%) for diagnosing cardiac disease across six dog breeds, and was particularly inaccurate in boxers.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a46fd688dd8ee6299050954https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.148.23.707
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effect of Breed and Body Weight on Echocardiographic Values in Four Breeds of Dogs of Differing Somatotype1992 · 173 citations
  2. 2Assessment of the value of the vertebral heart scale in the radiographic diagnosis of cardiac disease in dogs2000 · 76 citations
  3. 3Cardiomyopathy in Dystrophin-Deficient Hypertrophic Feline Muscular Dystrophy1999 · 43 citations
  4. 4Cardiomyopathy in Dystrophin-Deficient Hypertrophic Feline Muscular Dystrophy1999 · 51 citations
  5. 5Analysis of the cardiac silhouette in dorsoventral radiographs from dogs with heart disease.1968 · 41 citations