PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 4, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Phase-Coherent Spacetime: A Resonance-Driven Extension to General Relativity

View Full Paper
VSVien Nguyen SonSCSumit Chakravarty

Key Points

  • This research aims to propose a new model of gravity that incorporates phase coherence as a factor affecting spacetime behavior.
  • Introduced Coherence-Induced Gravity framework to adjust metrics and geodesic motion.
  • Proposed a resonance-coupling parameter to represent phase coherence effects.
  • Identified observational signatures for testing model predictions.
  • Model allows for gravitational-wave phase deviations and suggests detectable effects in weak/strong lensing.
  • Proposes laboratory-scale coherence-sensitive bounds to constrain the correction class.
  • Non-detection of predicted signatures would limit the extent of the proposed model.

Abstract

This revised theoretical preprint develops Phase-Coherent Spacetime as a candidate resonance-driven extension to general relativity. The associated framework, referred to as Coherence-Induced Gravity, formulates structured phase coherence as a possible effective contribution to metric behavior, geodesic evolution, gravitational-wave propagation, and large-scale gravitational signatures. The model is introduced as an effective correction class rather than as a replacement of general relativity, an additional empirical interaction, or an operational control scheme. Its central ansatz represents the effective metric as: g_μν = ḡ_μν + εΨ_μν where g_μν denotes the effective metric, ḡ_μν denotes the background metric associated with the standard relativistic comparison regime, Ψ_μν denotes a resonance-induced metric correction tensor, and ε denotes a perturbative coupling parameter. The standard relativistic regime is recovered when ε tends to zero. The preprint also introduces a local resonance-flow descriptor, β (λ), to represent scale-dependent coherence behavior within the correction class. The framework identifies candidate observational and experimental signatures, including gravitational-wave phase deviations, ringdown residuals, polarization and dispersion constraints, weak- and strong-lensing deviations, pulsar-timing residuals, galaxy-scale and large-scale-structure constraints, and laboratory-scale coherence-sensitive bounds. The scope of the paper is restricted to effective formulation, formal comparison, and observational constraint. Detection of compatible residuals would support further restriction and development of the correction class after competing explanations are bounded. Non-detection would constrain the magnitude, scale, or domain of applicability of the proposed correction. The paper explicitly distinguishes model formulation, observational readability, empirical constraint, external realization, and operational control.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Son et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a48a72989561a0c2d78ead5https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21130127
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Coherence-Induced Gravity: Structured Resonance as a Fundamental Component of Spacetime Dynamics2026
  2. 2Resonance Coherence in Gravitation: Effective Field-Theoretic Formalization of the Phase-Coherent Extension of General Relativity2026
  3. 3Structured Resonance, Gravity, and Material Stabilization: A Resonance-Coherence Framework2026
  4. 4Phase Coherence as an Order Parameter in Coupled Dissipative Systems2026
  5. 5Quantized Proper Time and Gravity as Resynchronization: A Minimal Discrete-Time Framework for Singularities and Quantum Corrections2025