PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2010Blood Pressure Monitoring264 citations

Validation of the mobil-O-Graph: 24 h-blood pressure measurement device

View Full Paper
WWWolfgang WeiMTMarkus TölleWZWalter Zidek

Key Result

The mobil-O-Graph blood pressure device met BHS standard accuracy requirements (grade A/A), with a mean systolic difference of -2.2 mmHg compared to mercury sphygmomanometry.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=85)

Structured PICO

Does the mobil-O-Graph device accurately measure blood pressure compared to standard auscultatory sphygmomanometry?

P
Population
85 patients (mean age 53.4 years) recruited to validate the mobil-O-Graph blood pressure measurement device against mercury sphygmomanometry.
E
Exposure
mobil-O-Graph 24-hour blood pressure measurement device
C
Comparator
Auscultatory sphygmomanometric readings obtained by two trained clinicians
O
Outcome
Differences between blood pressure values of the test device and the mercury reading according to the British Hypertension Society (BHS) criteriasurrogate

The mobil-O-Graph 24-hour blood pressure measurement device meets the accuracy requirements of the BHS standard and is recommended for clinical use.

Main Result

Mean Difference: -2.2

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Twenty-four-hour blood pressure measurement is of importance not only in the detection of hypertension but also in the detection of blood pressure changes in hypertensive and nonhypertensives over the day to identify, for example, nondipper hypertensives. This study describes the validation of the mobil-O-Graph according to the criteria of the British Hypertension Society (BHS). METHODS: For each patient three readings obtained by the mobil-O-Graph were compared with auscultatory sphygmomanometric readings obtained by two trained clinicians. The sphygmomanometric reference measurements were alternated with the readings obtained by the device. Eighty-five patients (mean age 53.4+/-18.4 years) were recruited for the BHS protocol. Differences between blood pressure values of the test device and the mercury reading were calculated for each measurement. RESULTS: In the BHS validation procedure the mean differences of the observer readings and the test device were -2.2+/-6.7 (systolic) and -0.6+/-5.6 mmHg (diastolic) for observer 1 and -2.2+/-7.3 mmHg (systolic) and-0.4+/-6.1 mmHg (diastolic) for observer 2. The device achieved grade A for systolic and diastolic blood pressure for both the observers 1 and 2 leading to a final grade A/A. According to the BHS protocol the measurements of the device have to be considered 'very accurate and with no error of clinical relevance'. CONCLUSION: The device met the accuracy requirements of the BHS standard and can be recommended for clinical use.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wei et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Blood pressure measurement (n=85). mobil-O-Graph device vs. auscultatory sphygmomanometric readings was evaluated on Mean differences between blood pressure values of the test device and the mercury reading (MD -2.2 mmHg (systolic)). The mobil-O-Graph blood pressure device met BHS standard accuracy requirements (grade A/A), with a mean systolic difference of -2.2 mmHg compared to mercury sphygmomanometry.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a4af1714e2f04c47c814614https://doi.org/10.1097/mbp.0b013e328338892f
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper