Abstract The etymology of the Hebrew lexeme ʾādām (אָדָם) remains one of the most debated questions in Biblical Hebrew and Semitic philology. Although the relationship between ʾādām ("human, אדם") and ʾădāmāh ("ground, soil, אדמה") has traditionally been regarded as self-evident, modern historical-comparative linguistics has demonstrated that literary wordplay cannot, by itself, establish historical etymology. This study presents a systematic critical review of the principal etymological hypotheses concerning the Hebrew lexeme ʾādām, combining evidence from classical Hebrew lexicography, comparative Semitic linguistics, and recent philological scholarship. Primary lexical evidence was examined through the major Hebrew lexicons (Gesenius, Davidson, BDB, HALOT, DCH), while comparative data were analyzed from Akkadian, Ugaritic, Phoenician-Punic, Aramaic, Syriac, Arabic, and Geʽez using standard lexicographical resources (CAD, AHw, CDA, DULAT, DNWSI, CAL, Payne Smith, Lane, and Dillmann). The study also evaluates modern discussions concerning literary paronomasia, semantic development, and the distinction between historical etymology and narrative interpretation. The analysis demonstrates that the literary relationship between ʾādām and ʾădāmāh in Genesis is firmly established, whereas none of the proposed historical etymologies—including derivation from "ground," "red," or "blood"—can presently be demonstrated with philological certainty. The evidence instead supports the existence of a broader Semitic lexical-semantic network while indicating that the ultimate historical origin of ʾādām remains unresolved. By integrating classical lexicography, comparative Semitic evidence, and recent scholarship within a single methodological framework, this study provides a comprehensive synthesis of current research and clarifies the distinction between demonstrable historical evidence and interpretative reconstruction. Keywords: Adam; ʾādām; Biblical Hebrew; Hebrew etymology; Semitic linguistics; comparative philology; historical linguistics; Genesis; Hebrew lexicography; Semitic etymology.
Željko Stanojević (Mon,) studied this question.