Axial-flux permanent-magnet (AFPM) machines are becoming an increasingly promising solution for electromechanical systems requiring high power density. In particular, their use is expanding to electric vehicles (EVs), the aerospace industry, and advanced industrial applications, such as renewable energy applications. Their compact design, high torque-to-mass ratio, and relatively high efficiency make AFPM machines an attractive alternative to traditional radial-flux solutions. However, their integration for widespread application remains limited due to challenges in design, manufacturing, thermal management, and control systems, which ultimately also have an economic impact. This article presents a comprehensive and systematic review of AFPM machines, covering key aspects, including topology classification, design methodologies, electromagnetic modelling, optimisation methods, materials and manufacturing processes, and advanced control strategies. A structured, multi-level classification of AFPM machines is presented, incorporating stator and rotor configurations, magnetic circuit structures, winding types, and materials, thereby providing a unified overview of existing designs. Furthermore, the article presents an in-depth analysis of the sizing equations used to calculate and estimate the parameters, approaches to electromagnetic modelling (including the finite element method and magnetic equivalent circuits), and modern optimisation methods based on artificial intelligence. Particular attention is paid to materials science and new manufacturing technologies, such as soft magnetic composites, printed circuit board stators, and additive manufacturing, as well as to thermal management solutions required for high-power-density applications. This work provides a unified reference framework for researchers and engineers and outlines future directions for the development and industrial adoption of AFPM machines.
Tangalychev et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: