PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 14, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Cross-Validation of Cliodynamics and LSED Theory — Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, Effective Population Oscillation, and Morphological Fractals

View Full Paper
JZJing Zhang

Key Points

  • This work aims to challenge the conventional Recent African Origin model by applying LSED theory and cliodynamics. It explores how historical energy deficits shaped human evolution in East Asia.
  • Employs six lines of evidence including genetic analysis of mitochondrial and Y-chromosome lineages.
  • Analyzes effective population size oscillation through glacial-interglacial cycles.
  • Investigates energy and entropy constraints within non-equilibrium thermodynamics.
  • Demonstrates that RAO model misrepresents effective population size as a fitting parameter; lacks empirical support.
  • Reveals methodological flaws in conflating mutation origin with population formation centers.
  • Shows that LSED provides a more robust framework for understanding human evolution in East Asia.

Abstract

The LSED (Low-Energy Selection-Driven/Quenching Belt Model) proposes that the energy deficit and population compression during glacial maxima constituted the physical boundary for the origin and evolution of modern humans in East Asia. This chapter proceeds from the methodological foundations of cliodynamics and non-equilibrium thermodynamics, and employs six independent lines of evidence—effective population size (Ne) oscillation across glacial-interglacial cycles, maternal mitochondrial L3 sub-lineages in East Asia, paternal Y-chromosome M122 in the Huang-Huai Plain, the non-equilibrium thermodynamic energy/entropy constraints, the northern stratigraphic sequence (Nihewan Basin + Bashan site group), and the mosaic morphology of the Xuchang crania—to conduct a cross-disciplinary falsification of the core assumptions of the classical Recent African Origin model (RAO, strict replacement + single out-of-Africa at ~68 ka). The results demonstrate that the RAO model's treatment of Ne as an adjustable fitting parameter, its reduction of L3 to a mere “African marker”, and its conflation of the southern origin of M122 mutation with a southern population hub all rest on a fundamental methodological fallacy: the confusion of “mutation origin” with “population formation center”. By replacing mathematical fitting with physical benchmarking, LSED constitutes a substantive rejection of the classical RAO narrative.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jing Zhang (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a55d11a5aafca87247f8316https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21321691
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper