This submission presents a systematic exploration of the physical scales —frequencies, lengths, times, energies, and dimensionless ratios— that emerge from combining the UAT/UCP fundamental constants with the constants of nature. The purpose is to identify values that (i) are physically meaningful, (ii) fall within experimentally accessible ranges, and (iii) do not coincide with any known physical constant. Such values constitute original, falsifiable predictions of the UAT/UCP framework. Methodology: The UAT/UCP constants (Ivancho limit κcrit = 4. 978, golden ratio φ ≈ 1. 618, thermal margin 7%, quantum brake kₑarly = 0. 967, causal overflow ε = 3. 3%, force metric Rgeom = 0. 279182, base frequency fbase = 187. 37 Hz) are systematically combined with fundamental physical constants (c, h, G, kB, mₑ, mₚ, α) using simple algebraic relations. Each resulting value is classified by experimental accessibility and originality (whether it coincides with a known constant). Key findings — Eleven original predictions: Causal overflow frequency: 6. 18 Hz — the rate at which the universe dissipates energy to sustain expansion. Ivancho-reduced frequency: 37. 64 Hz. Force metric frequency: 52. 31 Hz. Base frequency / φ: 115. 80 Hz. Base frequency × φ: 303. 17 Hz. Causal coherence length: 1. 62 nm — a characteristic nanoscale length. UAT base period: 5. 34 ms — measurable with optical clocks. Electron mass amplified by κcrit/φ: 2. 80 × 10⁻³⁰ kg. Ratio κcrit/ (α·φ): 422 (dimensionless). Ratio Rgeom/α: 38. 3 (dimensionless). UAT photon energy: 7. 75 × 10⁻¹³ eV — ultra-low energy spectral line. The most promising candidate for experimental follow-up is the causal overflow frequency (6. 18 Hz), which lies in the infrasound range and is accessible to seismometers, gravimeters, and low-frequency electromagnetic detectors. A dedicated search for a persistent, narrow-band signal at this frequency —exhibiting the predicted inflationary drift of +0. 046 Hz/day— would constitute a direct test of the framework. All predictions are derived from constants calibrated independently of the present analysis. No parameter was adjusted to produce any of the reported values. The accompanying Python script reproduces all calculations.
Miguel Percudani (Mon,) studied this question.