Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: Esophageal achalasia increasingly affects elderly patients, in whom frailty and comorbidity complicate management and heighten procedural risk. Minimally invasive Heller–Dor myotomy remains the reference surgical treatment, while the advent of robotics has renewed interest in its potential advantages. Whether these refinements translate into meaningful benefits for older adults remains unclear. This gap is clinically significant given the distinct physiological vulnerabilities of older adults. Methods: A narrative review of the literature was conducted to examine current evidence on robotic Heller–Dor myotomy for achalasia, with specific focus on its applicability in elderly and frail patients. Comparative studies between robotic and laparoscopic approaches were analyzed and integrated with available data on achalasia management in older individuals. Results: Robotic Heller–Dor myotomy demonstrates equivalent efficacy to laparoscopic surgery, with reduced mucosal perforation rates, improved ergonomics, and comparable operative times once the learning curve is achieved. However, no published series has specifically analyzed outcomes in geriatric cohorts. Available evidence from laparoscopic studies confirms that surgery remains safe and effective in geriatric patients, suggesting that the precision of robotics could potentially further enhance safety and recovery in this subgroup. Conclusions: Robotic Heller–Dor myotomy represents a promising evolution of minimally invasive therapy for achalasia, potentially aligning technological refinements with the physiological needs of older adults. Prospective studies incorporating frailty assessment, patient-centered outcomes, and cost analyses are required to determine its true value and guide evidence-based use in the aging population.
Fernicola et al. (Fri,) studied this question.