PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 24, 2026Critical Care Medicine0 citations

Facilitating Communication for Family Members of Critically Ill Patients During and Following a Hospital Stay: A Randomized Controlled Trial

View Full Paper
CCClaire J. CreutzfeldtLBL C BrumbackJIJennifer Im

Key Points

  • The study aimed to evaluate the impact of a communication facilitator on family depression following ICU stays.
  • Multicenter randomized controlled trial with 449 ICU patients and 505 family members.
  • Participants were engaged by trained nurse facilitators during ICU stay and for 3 months postrandomization.
  • Depression was measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at multiple time points.
  • Mean HADS-depression scores at 6 months were 5.9 for both control and intervention groups, indicating no significant difference.
  • Family relationships with healthcare teams improved but only showed statistically small effects (p = 0.0162).
  • Goal concordance reported by families indicated a favorable trend (p = 0.0504), but these effects were minimal.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Families of patients admitted to ICUs experience numerous care transitions, poor communication across these transitions, and emotional distress associated, in part, with the challenges of obtaining care consistent with patients' values. Specialized support from ICU to postacute setting may improve outcomes. DESIGN: Multicenter randomized, controlled trial of a "communication facilitator" intervention. SETTING: One healthcare system, three hospitals in Seattle, WA. PARTICIPANTS: ICU patients (n = 449) with chronic life-limiting illness (2-yr median survival, and/or acute, severe illness with greater than 15% hospital mortality risk) and their family members (n = 505). Patients were the unit of randomization (control, n = 224; intervention, n = 225). INTERVENTIONS: Nurse communication facilitators trained to support, model, and teach communication strategies to promote goal-concordant care. Facilitators engaged with participants in the ICU and for 3 months postrandomization. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was family member depression, measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at four time points (randomization, 1-, 3-, and 6-mo postrandomization). Among respondents, HADS-depression tended to decrease over time (mean ± sd = 7.2 ± 4.6 for control and 7.2 ± 4.2 for intervention at baseline; 5.9 ± 4.1 for control and 5.9 ± 4.5 for intervention at 6 mo). The difference in mean HADS-depression between intervention and control over 6 mo was not significantly different: -0.07 (95% CI, -0.70 to 0.55). Differences in family-reported secondary outcomes were in the expected direction, including relationship with the healthcare team (p = 0.0162) and goal concordance (p = 0.0504), but their effect sizes were small. CONCLUSIONS: For family members of critically ill patients facing a high likelihood of death or serious disability, involving a communication facilitator during and after an ICU stay did not lead to a reduction in depressive symptoms.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Creutzfeldt et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6300f2395161722cd15a88https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000007268
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper