Objectives: To collate subjective and objective outcome measures from cochlear implant recipients with asymmetric hearing loss. Methods: Forty-one CI recipients with asymmetrical hearing loss completed spatially separated speech in noise testing, speech in quiet testing, localisation testing, and tinnitus and quality of life questionnaires (SSQ and IOI-HA) pre-operatively and at 3, 12 and 24 months post-operatively. The results were used to generate a tool to help clinicians guide potential recipients through the counselling process. Results: Significant improvements in spatially separated SRT, localisation, tinnitus and the SSQ were observed for the group, with significant individual variability. CVC phoneme scores were not significantly different from those observed for CI recipients with bilateral hearing loss. The rates of non-use were consistent with those in the literature and were higher than for recipients with bilateral hearing loss. There was a significant correlation between PTA in the contralateral ear and localisation, and those recipients with a shorter duration of hearing loss were more likely to be satisfied with their CI. Discussion: Cochlear implantation for patients with asymmetrical hearing loss has the potential to offer improvements in head-shadow effects, localisation and tinnitus, with subjective measures also showing significant improvements post-operatively. There exists a large amount of individual variability across the group, however, which makes pre-operative counselling problematic for this patient cohort. Conclusions: The use of the study-generated counselling tool by clinicians may help patients make a more educated decision to proceed with implantation based upon realistic expectations of possible post-operative outcomes.
Rousset et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: