PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 6, 2022European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care32 citationsOpen Access

New-onset atrial fibrillation in intensive care: epidemiology and outcomes

JBJonathan BedfordPFPaloma Ferrando-VivasOROliver Redfern

Structured PICO

Does the development of new-onset atrial fibrillation during an ICU admission increase the risk of in-hospital mortality and long-term cardiovascular readmissions in critically ill adults?

P
Population
32,305 adult patients (≥16 years) admitted to 248 general ICUs for ≥4 hours in England, comprising 4,615 patients who developed new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) and 27,690 matched controls. Excluded cardiothoracic ICU admissions.
I
Intervention
Development of new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) during ICU admission
C
Comparator
Matched controls who did not develop NOAF during or prior to ICU admission
O
Outcome
In-hospital mortality; hospital readmission with atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke up to 6 years post discharge; and mortality up to 8 years post dischargehard clinical

New-onset atrial fibrillation during an ICU admission is independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality and long-term risks of readmission for AF, stroke, and heart failure, highlighting the need for post-discharge cardiological surveillance.

Limitations

  • Sensitivity of diagnostic records (NOAF may have been present but not recorded, or ambiguous if new vs pre-existing)
  • Prioritized specificity over sensitivity leading to low reported incidence
  • Missing data on risk factors like dyslipidaemia, smoking, alcohol use, and anticoagulation therapy
  • Did not analyze outcomes of patients with pre-existing AF

Abstract

AIMS: New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is common in patients treated on an intensive care unit (ICU), but the long-term impacts on patient outcomes are unclear. We compared national hospital and long-term outcomes of patients who developed NOAF in ICU with those who did not, before and after adjusting for comorbidities and ICU admission factors. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the RISK-II database (Case Mix Programme national clinical audit of adult intensive care linked with Hospital Episode Statistics and mortality data), we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 4615 patients with NOAF and 27 690 matched controls admitted to 248 adult ICUs in England, from April 2009 to March 2016. We examined in-hospital mortality; hospital readmission with atrial fibrillation (AF), heart failure, and stroke up to 6 years post discharge; and mortality up to 8 years post discharge. Compared with controls, patients who developed NOAF in the ICU were at a higher risk of in-hospital mortality unadjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.02-3.44, only partially explained by patient demographics, comorbidities, and ICU admission factors (adjusted OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.38-1.63). They were also at a higher risk of subsequent hospitalization with AF adjusted cause-specific hazard ratio (aCHR) 5.86, 95% CI 5.33-6.44, stroke (aCHR 1.47, 95% CI 1.12-1.93), and heart failure (aCHR 1.28, 95% CI 1.14-1.44) independent of pre-existing comorbidities. CONCLUSION: Patients who develop NOAF during an ICU admission are at a higher risk of in-hospital death and readmissions to hospital with AF, heart failure, and stroke than those who do not.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bedford et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6fd1d1ac440176ef287978https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjacc/zuac080
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper