PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2001103 citations

Start with a Subjective Assessment of Skin Temperature to Identify Hypoperfusion in Intensive Care Unit Patients

View Full Paper
LKLewis J. KaplanKMKenneth J. McPartlandTSThomas A. Santora

Structured PICO

Does subjective assessment of skin temperature identify hypoperfusion in surgical intensive care unit patients?

P
Population
264 consecutive surgical intensive care unit patients
I
Intervention
Subjective assessment of cool skin temperature (CST)
C
Comparator
Subjective assessment of warm skin temperature (WST)
O
Outcome
Diagnosis of hypoperfusion (defined by low SvO2 and cardiac index)surrogate

Subjective assessment of cool skin temperature, combined with elevated lactate and low bicarbonate, can effectively identify hypoperfusion in surgical ICU patients.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether physical examination alone or in combination with biochemical markers can accurately diagnose hypoperfusion. METHODS: Data from 264 consecutive surgical intensive care unit patients were collected by two intensivists and included extremity temperature, vital signs, arterial lactate, arterial blood gases, hemoglobin, and pulmonary artery catheter values with derived indices. Days of data were divided into data collected from patients with cool extremities (cool skin temperature CST group) versus warm extremities (warm skin temperature WST group). Values are means +/- SD. Comparisons between groups were made by two-tailed unpaired t test; significance was assumed for p 0.05) between CST and WST data with regard to heart rate (107 +/- 14 vs. 99 +/- 19 beats/min), systolic blood pressure (118 +/- 24 vs. 127 +/- 28 mm Hg), diastolic blood pressure (57 +/- 14 vs. 62 +/- 15 mm Hg), pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (14 +/- 6 vs. 16 +/- 5 mm Hg), Fio2 (0.48 +/- 0.7 vs. 0.45 +/- 0.2), hemoglobin (8.8 +/- 1.6 vs. 9.3 +/- 1.3 g/dL), Pco2 (44.3 +/- 11.8 vs. 40.7 +/- 9.2 mm Hg), or Po2 (96.4 +/- 12.6 vs. 103.8 +/- 22.2 mm Hg). However, cardiac output (5.3 +/- 2.2 vs. 8.2 +/- 2.6 L/min), cardiac index (2.9 +/- 1.2 vs. 4.3 +/- 1.2 L/min/m2), pH (7.32 +/- 0.2 vs. 7.39 +/- 0.07), TCO2 (19.5 +/- 3.1 vs. 25.1 +/- 4.8 mEq/L), and Svo2 (60.2 +/- 4.4% vs. 68.2 +/- 7.8%) were all significantly lower (p < 0.05) in CST patients compared with WST patients. By comparison, lactate (4.7 +/- 1.5 vs. 2.2 +/- 1.6 mmol/L, p < 0.05) was significantly elevated in patients with cool extremities. CONCLUSION: Combining physical examination with serum bicarbonate and arterial lactate identifies patients with hypoperfusion as defined by low Svo2 and cardiac index. Hypoperfusion may occur despite supranormal cardiac indices. Patients with cool extremities and elevated lactate levels may benefit from a pulmonary artery catheter to guide but not initiate therapy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kaplan et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a70200a439bab0cabc306f0https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-200104000-00005
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Persistent cool extremities as an independent predictor of adverse clinical outcomes among critically ill patients: a single-center retrospective observational study2024
  2. 2Skin Temperature and Limb Blood Flow as Predictors of Cardiac Index1995 · 4 citations
  3. 3Thermoregulatory and metabolic responses following cardiac surgery1996 · 6 citations
  4. 4The use of thermal imaging for evaluation of peripheral tissue perfusion in surgical patients with septic shock2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5Utility of core to skin temperature gradient and capillary refill time in determining prognosis for patients with septic shock: A prospective observational study2025