PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 30, 2010BMC Medical Imaging44 citationsOpen Access

MRI plaque imaging reveals high-risk carotid plaques especially in diabetic patients irrespective of the degree of stenosis

LEL. EspositoTSTobias SaamPHP. Heider

Structured PICO

Does Type 2 diabetes mellitus increase the prevalence of MRI-defined high-risk carotid plaques in patients with moderate to high-grade carotid artery stenosis?

P
Population
191 patients with moderate to high-grade carotid artery stenosis (11 excluded due to insufficient MR-image quality, leaving 180 analyzed), including 51 (28.3%) with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
I
Intervention
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM 2)
C
Comparator
Nondiabetic patients
O
Outcome
Presence of MRI-defined high-risk carotid plaque lesion types (classified according to MRI-modified AHA criteria)surrogate

Type 2 diabetes is an independent predictor of vulnerable, high-risk carotid plaques as identified by MRI, regardless of the degree of stenosis.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Plaque imaging based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents a new modality for risk assessment in atherosclerosis. It allows classification of carotid plaques in high-risk and low-risk lesion types (I-VIII). Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM 2) represents a known risk factor for atherosclerosis, but its specific influence on plaque vulnerability is not fully understood. This study investigates whether MRI-plaque imaging can reveal differences in carotid plaque features of diabetic patients compared to nondiabetics. METHODS: 191 patients with moderate to high-grade carotid artery stenosis were enrolled after written informed consent was obtained. Each patient underwent MRI-plaque imaging using a 1.5-T scanner with phased-array carotid coils. The carotid plaques were classified as lesion types I-VIII according to the MRI-modified AHA criteria. For 36 patients histology data was available. RESULTS: Eleven patients were excluded because of insufficient MR-image quality. DM 2 was diagnosed in 51 patients (28.3%). Concordance between histology and MRI-classification was 91.7% (33/36) and showed a Cohen's kappa value of 0.81 with a 95% CI of 0.98-1.15. MRI-defined high-risk lesion types were overrepresented in diabetic patients (n = 29; 56.8%). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed association between DM 2 and MRI-defined high-risk lesion types (OR 2.59; 95% CI 1.15-5.81), independent of the degree of stenosis. CONCLUSION: DM 2 seems to represent a predictor for the development of vulnerable carotid plaques irrespective of the degree of stenosis and other risk factors. MRI-plaque imaging represents a new tool for risk stratification of diabetic patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Esposito et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a70398575498292b7099e2bhttps://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-10-27
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper