PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1996Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation35 citations

Training Level Comparison Study: EFFECT OF HIGH AND LOW INTENSITY EXERCISE ON VENTILATORY THRESHOLD IN MEN WITH CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE

View Full Paper
BJBetsy E. JensenBFBarbara J. FletcherJRJeffrey C. Rupp

Structured PICO

Does high intensity exercise improve ventilatory threshold and peak VO2 more than low intensity exercise in men with coronary artery disease?

P
Population
186 men with coronary artery disease (CAD)
I
Intervention
High intensity exercise (85% of peak VO2), 45 minutes of walking/jogging and/or stationary cycling 3 days per week for 1 year
C
Comparator
Low intensity exercise (50% of peak VO2), 45 minutes of walking/jogging and/or stationary cycling 3 days per week for 1 year
O
Outcome
Improvement of the ventilatory threshold (VT) and peak VO2surrogate

In men with coronary artery disease, high-intensity exercise yields greater improvements in ventilatory threshold and peak oxygen uptake than low-intensity exercise.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether exercise at low intensity (LO; 50% of peak VO2) or high intensity (HI; 85% of peak VO2) results in improvement of the ventilatory threshold (VT), 186 men with coronary artery disease (CAD) were enrolled in an exercise study for 1 year. METHODS: A symptom-limited exercise test was performed at baseline and the heart rate corresponding to 50% and 85% of peak VO2 was determined. Subjects were randomized to LO or HI intensity exercise. Exercise sessions included 45 minutes of walking/jogging and/or stationary cycling at the appropriate target heart rate and were conducted 3 days per week. The exercise test was repeated at 3 and 6 months. Target heart rates were revised to adjust for training. RESULTS: Both LO and HI resulted in improved VO2 at VT and peak. However, HI resulted in greater improvement than LO. CONCLUSION: Among this population, both HI and LO improve the VO2 at VT and peak, but the improvement is greater with HI. The VT can be a useful adjunct to heart rate and peak oxygen uptake when prescribing exercise.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jensen et al. (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a70ab95ac440176ef295542https://doi.org/10.1097/00008483-199607000-00003
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1High intensity aerobic interval exercise is superior to moderate intensity exercise for increasing aerobic capacity in patients with coronary artery disease2004 · 706 citations
  2. 2Optimal doses of high-intensity interval training in patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis2026
  3. 3Training intensity relative to ventilatory thresholds determines cardiorespiratory fitness improvements in sedentary adults with obesity2018 · 14 citations
  4. 4Effects of High Intensity Interval versus Moderate Continuous Training on Markers of Ventilatory and Cardiac Efficiency in Coronary Heart Disease Patients2015 · 73 citations
  5. 5Adherence in the Training Levels Comparison Trial1996 · 84 citations