PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2007BMJ175 citationsOpen Access

Effectiveness of visits from community pharmacists for patients with heart failure: HeartMed randomised controlled trial

RHRichard HollandIBI A BrooksbyELElizabeth Lenaghan

Key Points

  • To assess if community pharmacists' interventions can reduce hospital admissions or mortality in heart failure patients.
  • Randomised controlled trial design with 293 participants post-emergency admission

Structured PICO

Does a community pharmacist home visit intervention reduce hospital readmissions at six months in patients with heart failure after an emergency admission?

P
Population
293 patients diagnosed with heart failure after an emergency admission
I
Intervention
Two home visits by a community pharmacist within two and eight weeks of discharge, providing drug review, symptom self-management, and lifestyle advice
C
Comparator
Usual care
O
Outcome
Total hospital readmissions at six monthshard clinical

A home-based community pharmacist intervention providing drug review and lifestyle advice did not reduce hospital readmissions or mortality in patients recently hospitalized for heart failure.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test whether a drug review and symptom self management and lifestyle advice intervention by community pharmacists could reduce hospital admissions or mortality in heart failure patients. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Home based intervention in heart failure patients. PARTICIPANTS: 293 patients diagnosed with heart failure were included (149 intervention, 144 control) after an emergency admission. INTERVENTION: Two home visits by one of 17 community pharmacists within two and eight weeks of discharge. Pharmacists reviewed drugs and gave symptom self management and lifestyle advice. Controls received usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was total hospital readmissions at six months. Secondary outcomes included mortality and quality of life (Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire and EQ-5D). RESULTS: Primary outcome data were available for 291 participants (99%). 136 (91%) intervention patients received one or two visits. 134 admissions occurred in the intervention group compared with 112 in the control group (rate ratio=1.15, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.48; P=0.28, Poisson model). 30 intervention patients died compared with 24 controls (hazard ratio=1.18, 0.69 to 2.03; P=0.54). Although EQ-5D scores favoured the intervention group, Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire scores favoured controls; neither difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This community pharmacist intervention did not lead to reductions in hospital admissions in contrast to those found in trials of specialist nurse led interventions in heart failure. Given that heart failure accounts for 5% of hospital admissions, these results present a problem for policy makers who are faced with a shortage of specialist provision and have hoped that skilled community pharmacists could produce the same benefits. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN59427925.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Holland et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7214915d37378ac1df01d5https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39164.568183.ae
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper