PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 5, 2011Intensive Care Medicine295 citationsOpen Access

Clinical presentation, management and outcomes in the Acute Heart Failure Global Survey of Standard Treatment (ALARM-HF)

View Full Paper
FFFerenc FolláthMYMehmet Birhan YılmazJDJuan F. Delgado

Structured PICO

P
Population
4,953 patients with acute heart failure (AHF) from 666 hospitals across 9 countries
O
Outcome
Hospital death ratehard clinical

The ALARM-HF survey highlights significant differences in mortality and clinical presentation between de novo and pre-existing acute heart failure, as well as across different hospital admission settings.

Abstract

PURPOSE: We performed a survey on acute heart failure (AHF) in nine countries in four continents. We aimed to describe characteristics and management of AHF among various countries, to compare patients with de novo AHF versus patients with a pre-existing episode of AHF, and to describe subpopulations hospitalized in intensive care unit (ICU) versus cardiac care unit (CCU) versus ward. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 4,953 patients with AHF were collected via questionnaire from 666 hospitals. Clinical presentation included decompensated congestive HF (38.6%), pulmonary oedema (36.7%) and cardiogenic shock (11.7%). Patients with de novo episode of AHF (36.2%) were younger, had less comorbidities and lower blood pressure despite greater left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and were more often admitted to ICU. Overall, intravenous (IV) diuretics were given in 89.7%, vasodilators in 41.1%, and inotropic agents (dobutamine, dopamine, adrenaline, noradrenaline and levosimendan) in 39% of cases. Overall hospital death rate was 12%, the majority due to cardiogenic shock (43%). More patients with de novo AHF (14.2%) than patients with a pre-existing episode of AHF (10.8%) (p = 0.0007) died. There was graded mortality in ICU, CCU and ward patients with mortality in ICU patients being the highest (17.8%) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated the existence of different subgroups based on de novo or pre-existing episode(s) of AHF and the site of hospitalization. Recognition of these subgroups might improve management and outcome by defining specific therapeutic requirements.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Folláth et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a72e0a3c9955ae7e77485c4https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-010-2113-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper