PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 2009American Journal of Hypertension38 citations

Prevalence and Predictors of Masked Hypertension Detected by Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in Children and Adolescents: The Arsakeion School Study

View Full Paper
GSGeorge S. StergiouVRVayia RarraNYN. G. Yiannes

Key Result

Using a two-visit-average office blood pressure compared to a single visit changed the detected prevalence of masked hypertension from 3.3% to 4.2% (P<0.001) in children and adolescents.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=765)

Structured PICO

What is the prevalence and what are the predictors of masked hypertension detected by home blood pressure monitoring in children and adolescents?

P
Population
765 children and adolescents aged 6-18 years assessed with office and home blood pressure measurements to determine the prevalence and predictors of masked hypertension.
E
Exposure
Home blood pressure monitoring (3 days, 12 readings)
C
Comparator
Office blood pressure measurements (two visits, six readings)
O
Outcome
Prevalence and characteristics of masked hypertension (MH)

Masked hypertension is not uncommon in children and adolescents when assessed by home blood pressure monitoring, and is associated with prehypertension and overweight.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 4.2% vs 3.3%

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies using ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring have shown that in children and adolescents masked hypertension (MH) is not uncommon. This school-based study investigated the prevalence and the characteristics of MH diagnosed using home BP measurements. METHODS: A total of 765 subjects aged 6-18 years were assessed with office (two visits, six readings) and home BP measurements (3 days, 12 readings). Office hypertension was diagnosed using the US Task Force normalcy tables and home hypertension using the Arsakeion normalcy tables (> or = 95th percentile for both). White-coat hypertension (WCH) was defined as office hypertension but low home BP (<95th percentile) and MH as home hypertension but low office BP (<95th percentile). RESULTS: On the basis of office BP measurements of the first visit 3.3% of participants had MH, 5.9% WCH, and 2.7% hypertension compared to 4.2, 2.1, and 1.8%, respectively, when a two-visit-average BP was used (P < 0.001 vs. first visit). Subjects with MH or WCH did not differ from hypertensives or normotensives regarding age, gender, or height. However, weight, body mass index (BMI), waist and hip circumference, and office and home BP values fell in between those of normotensives and hypertensives. Prehypertension (office BP: 90-95th centile) and increased BMI were independent predictors of MH. CONCLUSIONS: In children and adolescents MH detected by home BP monitoring is not uncommon and is associated with prehypertension and overweight. Repeated office measurements are essential for the precise diagnosis. MH and WCH in children appear to be intermediate phenotypes of hypertension.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stergiou et al. (2009) conducted a cross-sectional in Masked hypertension (n=765). Two-visit-average office blood pressure vs. First visit office blood pressure was evaluated on Prevalence of masked hypertension (p=<0.001). Using a two-visit-average office blood pressure compared to a single visit changed the detected prevalence of masked hypertension from 3.3% to 4.2% (P<0.001) in children and adolescents.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a74f1326a5eb4b8f5093b5ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/ajh.2009.34
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper