PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2006Journal of Investigative Surgery18 citations

Impact of Acute Myocardial Edema on Left Ventricular Function

View Full Paper
UFUwe FischerCCCharles S. CoxRSRandolph H. Stewart

Structured PICO

Does acute myocardial edema impair LV systolic and diastolic function in anesthetized dogs?

P
Population
Anesthetized dogs (n = 12) instrumented with myocardial ultrasonic crystals and an LV micromanometer.
I
Intervention
Induction of myocardial edema via coronary sinus balloon inflation for 2 h (CSH group, n=6) or cardiopulmonary bypass with hyperkalemic cardioplegic solution (Plegisol group, n=6).
C
Comparator
Baseline measurements prior to edema generation.
O
Outcome
Left ventricular systolic function (PRSW and dP/dt(max)) and diastolic function (-dP/dt(max) and tau) measured for 2 h after edema generation.surrogate

Acute myocardial edema without myocardial injury does not impair left ventricular systolic or diastolic function in a canine model.

Abstract

Studies of the impact of myocardial edema on left ventricular (LV) systolic function show conflicting results. We sought to evaluate the impact of increased myocardial water content (MWC) on LV systolic and diastolic function. Anesthetized dogs (n = 12) were instrumented with myocardial ultrasonic crystals and an LV micromanometer. Systolic function was measured by preload recruitable stroke work (PRSW) and dP/dt(max). Diastolic function was measured by -dP/dt(max) and the isovolumic relaxation constant tau (t). Myocardial water content (MWC) was determined using microgravimetry. In six dogs (coronary sinus hypertension, CSH group) we produced myocardial edema by inflating a coronary sinus balloon for 2 h (30-40 mm Hg). In six other dogs (Plegisol, PLEG group) cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was initiated (12.3 +/- 0.8 min), the aorta was cross-clamped (117 +/- 19 s), and 700 mL 4 degrees C crystalloid, hyperkalemic cardioplegic solution (Plegisol) was administered into the aortic root (62 +/- 4 mm Hg). After declamping and reperfusion (7.2 +/- 1.0 min), the dogs were separated from CPB. Myocardial function parameters and MWC were measured for 2 h after edema generation. In the CSH group, MWC significantly increased from 75.9 +/- 0.3% to 77.6 +/- 0.3% (p < .05). In the PLEG group, MWC increased from 75.8 +/- 0.3% to 77.7 +/- 0.3% (p < .05). PRSW and dP/dt(max) did not decrease in either group. Diastolic parameters did not change significantly. We conclude that acute myocardial edema without myocardial injury does not impair LV function.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fischer et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7a3f0a123479a499f379dfhttps://doi.org/10.1080/08941930500444438
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effect of acute edema on left ventricular function and coronary vascular resistance in the isolated rat heart1994 · 76 citations
  2. 2Effects of hypoproteinemia-induced myocardial edema on left ventricular function1998 · 50 citations
  3. 3Iatrogenic Myocardial Edema: Increased Diastolic Compliance and Time Course of Resolution in Vivo1996 · 37 citations
  4. 4Effects of Edema on Systolic and Diastolic Function In Vivo1995 · 17 citations
  5. 5AWARD ARTICLE: Microcirculatory Society Award for Excellence in Lymphatic ResearchTime Course of Myocardial Interstitial Edema Resolution and Associated Left Ventricular Dysfunction2012 · 23 citations